|
[Sponsors] |
November 19, 2006, 07:29 |
Turbulent flow over backward step
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would like to know why segregated solver is taken for incompressible flow instead of coupled solver
|
|
November 19, 2006, 18:46 |
Re: Turbulent flow over backward step
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
First of all, you should specified what type of solver in terms of method, formulism, etc.
The old approach, i.e. the segregated solver, was a consequence of limited computer capacity mainly in terms of memory. It is possible to observe a new trend in the development of high performance solver based on the partially or fully couple approach. |
|
November 20, 2006, 06:22 |
Re: Turbulent flow over backward step
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks for the reply.I am working on simulation of steady state incompressible turbulent flow over a backward facing step.Fluent literature says it is customary to use segregated solver for incompressible flow.But there are no technical reasons for it.I need them.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
Natural convection - Inlet boundary condition | max91 | CFX | 1 | July 29, 2008 21:28 |
backward facing step flow | gopinath | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 22, 2005 06:02 |
backward facing step flow | senthamarai kannan | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 22, 2005 06:01 |