|
[Sponsors] |
October 23, 2006, 10:58 |
Reynold's number and incompressible flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
I am a beginner at modelling incompressible flow conditions. I have read some papers which model incompressible internal flow and they mention that they are restricted to low Reynold's number for stability reasons. Does solving high Re number flows present a particular difficulty when solving the incompressible flow equations? How are stability problems resolved? by using a finer mesh? Thanks Neil |
|
October 23, 2006, 17:25 |
Re: Reynold's number and incompressible flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I guess the answer to your question depends on clarification of some points you brush over:
a) Who are "they", in your sentence "they are restricted to low Reynold's number"? The flows, the algorithms, ... (if I read your sentence literally, the papers mention that the papers are restricted... which would be very bad behavior for a paper) b) Related to question a), what type of stability are we talking about: Flow stability, numerical stability... c) What Reynolds number are we talking about, i.e. how is it defined. Is it the cell Reynolds number (Peclet number)? A clear question has the best chance to prompt a clear answer. Lucky for you, this forum is not an oracle which gives you only one shot. Try again. |
|
October 24, 2006, 03:56 |
Re: Reynold's number and incompressible flow
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry for not making my question clearer
a) It is the algorithm that is restricted to low Reynold's numbers b) numerical instability c) Reynold's number is defined based on the diameter of the flow channel Thanks for your help Neil |
|
October 24, 2006, 09:11 |
Re: Reynold's number and incompressible flow
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What type of internal flow is it? Pipes, pumps... How low a Reynolds number is required? The only thing I can imagine right now is that you have an algorithm for laminar flow. If that's the case, the numerical instability observed at higher Reynolds numbers is actually related to the physical instability of the laminar flow. If the algorithm does handle turbulent flows, there may be some limit associated with the turbulence model. Other than that, a Reynolds number restriction would seem odd to me.
To answer your question about grid resolution, yes, there is a dependence on the Reynolds number. The higher the Reynolds number, the thinner the boundary layers, the higher the requirement on the grid resolution. This is primarily an accuracy requirement. If coarse grids also cause a stability problem will depend on the algorithm. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow | M.Sc_Student | FLUENT | 4 | April 7, 2010 11:28 |
Flapping Airfoil Simulation in Low Reynolds Number Flow | M.Sc_Student | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 6, 2010 10:30 |
High Reynolds Number Incompressible Flow | Nick Lavery | Main CFD Forum | 3 | February 19, 2002 16:47 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 13:19 |
Difficulties in solving a high Reynolds number Flow? | wowakai | Main CFD Forum | 10 | December 29, 1998 14:46 |