|
[Sponsors] |
October 12, 2006, 09:58 |
Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
as far as I'm concerned rotating geometries are a very difficult problem in CFD because of the high mesh deformation. But what are the most common methods when we have rotating geometries such as impellers and so on? Have a nice day! Chuck |
|
October 12, 2006, 11:03 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
these are MRF and mixing plane
|
|
October 12, 2006, 11:08 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks sam. No I have sth. I can search for!
|
|
October 12, 2006, 11:33 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
typo: I wanted to write "Now I have sth. I can search for!"
|
|
October 12, 2006, 12:10 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ok search more for mixing plane and its development and let me know wat u understood then we can discuss a bit more
|
|
October 12, 2006, 13:48 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Do you know any book or paper on this issue? It is very hard to find information on "mixing plane" or MRF via google. I can only find documents where there is said that a certain method was used, but without explanation.
|
|
October 12, 2006, 14:04 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
try rotating reference frame or similar but MRF is not the best approach to rotating geometries, its fairly good for easy quick results but is not as accurate as proper moving mesh. A better approach is to use either a sliding moving mesh or a deforming mesh where the connectivity at the rotating interface. This way the cells are re-defined as the mesh slides.
|
|
October 12, 2006, 14:05 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
http://www.cd-adapco.com/press_room/...cs/23/mrf.html try that.....
|
|
October 12, 2006, 16:58 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Besides the sliding mesh, one thing you can try is overset(chimera) grid.
|
|
October 13, 2006, 10:24 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello, is mixing plane the same as sliding mesh?
|
|
October 13, 2006, 12:40 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
no.
|
|
October 14, 2006, 10:51 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
They are totally different, I think
|
|
October 14, 2006, 10:54 |
Re: Rotating geometries; approaches in CFD
|
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For simulation of turbomachinery flow field with a stator and rotor, is there any chance to use sliding mesh or overset grid if the steady flow governing equations are to be solved?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rotating equipment CFD recommendation | Prospective User | FLUENT | 1 | December 4, 2003 12:12 |
rotating equipment CFD recommendation | Prospective User | CFX | 2 | December 3, 2003 06:58 |
CFD for fans & blower housings | David Carroll | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 24, 2000 18:25 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:49 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |