 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
September 24, 2013, 14:01
|
Mesh-size problem with Gmsh
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Andrea Prestigiacomo
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Milan
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13  |
Hi everybody,
I'm new in Gmsh and meshing software in general. A part of my thesis work consist in the Thermo-Hydraulic simulation (with openFOAM 2.2.1) of a nuclear reactor (TRIGA mark II) with a detailed geometry. I've already made a quite detailed geometry with Gmsh, that you can find in the attached file. The problem is that, in order to reduce the number of elements, I would like to have smaller tetrahedral element size at boundaries and bigger elements in the bulk regions. I've already tried with the BoundaryLayer field, but it seems to work just for 2D mesh. I'll appreciate any comments and/or suggestions. Thank you in advance. Andrea Last edited by DanAndrea87; September 26, 2013 at 05:07. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| 3d mesh, boundarylayer, gmsh, mesh size, openfoam 2.2.1 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynamic Mesh Problem. | Tom Clark | FLUENT | 10 | June 21, 2021 05:27 |
| Gambit problems | Althea | FLUENT | 22 | January 4, 2017 04:19 |
| [snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
| CAD -> gMsh -> enGrid -> OpenFOAM Problem | AlGates | OpenFOAM | 7 | August 6, 2010 13:46 |
| [snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
Linear Mode
