|
[Sponsors] |
September 12, 2013, 08:03 |
blowing boundary condition
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi guys,
i am currently working on a problem and am kind off stuck at the boundary condition. i am computing a super sonic Ma=2.6 2d flow over a flat plate with a slot from which a subsonic cooling film is emmitted using a WENO scheme and a flow solver not written by me. the problem is the boundary condition at the slot: a constant massflow rate should be blown into the boundary layer. the mass flow is defined as follows: massflow rate dot m=rho_c*v_c*A (1) therein rho_c*v_c=F_c (2) is a given as the blowing rate F_c. the blowing rates used are small F_c=0.065 also the temperature of the coolant gas is give T_c the area of the slot A is also known. the pressure is taken from the flowfield above the slot p_c and is used to compute the density rho_c as such: rho_c=p_c/T_c (3) for the implementation of the boundary condition i need the pressure p_c which is taken from the flowfield an is not a constant the density rho_c which is also not a constant see (3) the velocity v_c=F_c/rho_c=F_c/p_c my questions/problems are: (a) when i compute the solution using these boundary conditions do i get a constant massflow rate? (b) also by using the pressure from the flow field the density rho_c and the velocity v_c change and cause oscillation how can this be avoided? (c) how would you guys implement a constant massflow rate? (d) does it make sense from a physics standpoint to prescribe the pressure p_c instead of getting it from the flowfield? thanks a lot for your help Last edited by Jochen; September 12, 2013 at 10:14. |
|
September 13, 2013, 07:15 |
further explanation
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 13 |
so a day has gone by and nobody was able to help me
anyway to further elaborate on my problem: the boundary conditions in the solver i am using are prescribed for the slot from which the coolant is emmitted as follows: the wall is situated between to cells 4 and 5 the wall normal vector points in y direction (north); to get the pressure from the flowfield the following is used: p[0]=p[9] p[1]=p[8] p[2]=p[7] p[3]=p[6] p[4]=p[5] this essentially says dp/dy=0 the density is defined as the pressure from the flowfield divided by the given coolant temperature T_c: rho[0]=p[9]/T_c . . . rho[4]=p[5]/T_c so now the density is a function of the flowfieldpressure. finally the velocity is set using the given blowing rate F_c: v[0]=F_c/rho[0] . . . v[4]=F_c/rho[4] all variables are double precision. if i then compute the massflux: dot m/A[0]= v[0]*rho[0]=(F_c/rho[0]) *rho[0] it should equal F_c. running this code the computed dot m/A shows a difference from F_c in the order of F_c-dot m/A=10^-13 after ~ 20,000 iteration steps the computed d m/A equals F_c. is the formula for the massflux correct? is it physically correct that the rho[0] cancels out for the analytical solution? thanks again and any comment is welcome. Last edited by Jochen; September 13, 2013 at 08:19. |
|
Tags |
boundary, condition, filmcooling, massflow |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation interface | hinca | CFX | 15 | January 26, 2014 18:11 |
Question about heat transfer coefficient setting for CFX | Anna Tian | CFX | 1 | June 16, 2013 07:28 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code | Mukund Pondkule | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 16, 2011 04:23 |
How to set boundary condition in Fluent for the fo | Peiyong | FLUENT | 1 | November 10, 2006 12:44 |