|
[Sponsors] |
September 18, 2006, 16:43 |
Questions about NASA-VOF2D/SOLA-VOF
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It seems that NASA-VOF2D and SOLA-VOF have a little different algorithm for claculation of PETA in the subroutine PETACAL. This is in the first step for claculation of PETA.
NASA-VOF2D: in Line PETACAL 818-IF (NF(L,M). NE.0) PETA(I,J) = 1.0. The following 4 lines indicate that only when NF(I,J) = 1,2,3 or 4, the rest codes are executed. SOLA-VOF: in Line 1415- IF (BETA(L,M).LT.0.0) PETA(I,J) = 1.0. And at all conditions, the rest codes are executed. Do these two alogrithm have the same results? Which one is better? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question:Considerations about the evaporation in VOF | dokeun | FLUENT | 10 | February 24, 2011 21:47 |
Segmentation fault in running alternateSteadyReactingFoam,why? | NewKid | OpenFOAM | 18 | January 20, 2011 17:55 |
Questions concerning VOF | CFDtoy | Main CFD Forum | 10 | November 1, 2006 23:28 |
Difficult BCs about Freesurface Simulation by VOF | Yongguang Cheng | FLUENT | 0 | September 19, 2003 08:39 |
Moving mesh or VOF? | Giovanni | Main CFD Forum | 16 | September 24, 2001 09:25 |