|
[Sponsors] |
September 13, 2006, 10:02 |
some confusion about the Galerkin principle
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi:
Let R represent a residiual of a partial differential equation in a two dimensional plat pipe, take steady convection-diffusino equation for example. we now apply the Galerkin which enforce the residual R to be orthogonal to each of the Basis function on in the y direction, integral( R*phi,y=0..1)dy now i want to apply the same procedure to the same problem in a pipi , i.e. two dimension axissysmetry system, integral(R*phi,r=0..1) r dr i am very confused about whether the "r" should included in the above equation. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Galerkin projection | sara2115 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 5, 2011 11:57 |
Discontinuous Galerkin schemes -- fortran source code | diedro | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 12, 2011 11:20 |
Navier stokes and the standard Galerkin method | micheldup | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 1, 2011 10:24 |
Weak statement for Galerkin Method | rugabug | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 26, 2010 20:19 |
Calculating principle stresses (Difficult) | Joe | CFX | 5 | March 7, 2007 12:55 |