|
[Sponsors] |
July 29, 2013, 11:20 |
RANS Modeling- Estimating K and Epsilon
|
#1 |
New Member
Matt Mosquera
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lewisburg, PA
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi everyone,
I'm working on a summer internshp program and need to estimate k and epsilon from two sources of data. The first source is a hotwire which has been placed in a channel. The second is a pipe in which I know the velocity throughout. I've estimated the first by using the Bousinesq hypothesis to relate the turbulent dissipation energy to the turbulent kinetic energy. The relationships are k=1/2(u'^2+v'^2'w'^2), estimating w' to be the average of u' and v'. epsilon=du/dy*cmu*k^2/(u'v') For the second, I used empirical relationships from the following site; http://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flue...ug/node238.htm This got me k and epsilon values at the inlet of the pipe flow. If anyone more familiar with CFD theory could have a look at my derivation/results for k and epsilon, it would be incredibly helpful. I'm afraid my solutions aren't converging with reasonable results for k and epsilon. k tends to drop to machine zero, which obviously isn't valid. Attached is a link to the spreadsheet where I worked with the data https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...elp/sample.ods Any help would be appreciated, Thanks, Matt |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 09:30 |
calculate epsilon from RANS k-Omega simulation | CFD_Monkey | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | June 27, 2013 11:55 |
epsilon and K blowing up. | sivakumar | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 25, 2012 05:50 |
why omega instead of epsilon in turbulence modeling | pgoyal10 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 5, 2012 12:02 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 21:21 |