|
[Sponsors] |
August 3, 2006, 12:36 |
Vortex method vs High Reynolds number
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm currently working on a code, solving incompressible 3D flow using discrete vortex method. The new idea (probably not that new) for this method is the use of a grid system and finite volume method. But, the problem is that I can only carry out simulations for a Reynolds number lower than 1000, othervise the simulation would become unstable. What could be the reasons for this limitation? the differential scheme ? or grid resolution? Hope someone here could help me out. Thanks |
|
August 4, 2006, 02:15 |
Re: Vortex method vs High Reynolds number
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think I have seen a recent paper doing exactly as you suggest; using finite volume methods but using bio-savart law to get the velocities at the finite volume interfaces. If this is what you're doing it isn't new. Hopefully, it's not a thesis material ) (BTW, discrete vortex method has a distinct connotation, which assumes a meshless computation). As for your questions, it's too general ...
Adrin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two way particle coupling in OF 2.0 and the particle reynolds number | preichl | OpenFOAM | 7 | February 9, 2012 16:38 |
Reynolds Number | Matt | CFX | 0 | February 25, 2009 06:40 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
Reynolds number help | Mech | FLUENT | 0 | March 15, 2006 11:28 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |