|
[Sponsors] |
May 22, 2013, 04:31 |
Hybrid mesh quality
|
#1 |
Member
Johannes Ringborn
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 14 |
Dear all of you,
I am meshing now as a student for 2 years with different programs (ICEMCFD, Ansys meshing, Gridgen). While doing hybrid meshes (mostly 2d) I heard and read a lot of different opinions how a "good" hybrid mesh should look like (y+, transition...). So here are a few questions: -Is it essential that the 99% velocity boundary layer lies completely within the inflated structured layer? (as it is sometimes not doable...) -Is there a personal preference of the growth ratio of the inflated boundary layer and the size of it? (I heard everything from a ratio of 1.05 to 1.2 with 20 to 40 layers) -Maybe the most important question: what is a good transition between the structured (e.g. quad) and the unstructured (e.g. tri) domain. Is it only a relatively small area/volume change and a small skewness of the cells in both of the domains? (and if so, what should be max for this area-/volume-change?) -what are other criterias for a nice transition Any comments would be highly appreciated! Best regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] mesh in-dependency and mesh quality control | sujay | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | February 20, 2013 03:06 |
[ICEM] The pre-mesh quality is very good but the mesh quality is bad | lnk | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | July 30, 2012 15:11 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
[ICEM] hybrid mesh | vmlxb6 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | March 9, 2011 14:44 |
Improve Mesh quality - airfoil simulation | Lukas84 | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | July 6, 2010 11:07 |