|
[Sponsors] |
June 21, 2006, 01:43 |
implicit scheme for time step
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,everyone,
I want to use high-order implicit scheme for time step. Which kinds of scheme should I choose for shock capturing? Thanks! vivian |
|
June 21, 2006, 13:01 |
Re: implicit scheme for time step
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I thint to chature the shock, one need a high resolution space shemem! am i right!
|
|
June 21, 2006, 22:38 |
Re: implicit scheme for time step
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank for your reply!
Yes!I think using the high-scheme for space is important. Do you think the high-scheme for time is also important or less important than high-scheme for space or can be ignored for shock capturing? vivian |
|
June 22, 2006, 02:27 |
Re: implicit scheme for time step
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on the time nature of your problem. If you are concerning about steady-state solution, high-order scheme for time is less important and you should devise a time-marching scheme which can result in rapid convergence(good damping property). For real transient case, of course, higher-order scheme is attractive in terms of resolving the unsteadiness.
For shock-capturing purpose, I presume that spatial differencing scheme plays a very important role. It is crucial not only in the subject of numerical accuracy(high-order scheme) in order to allow us to resolve the shock wave sharply, the scheme must be bounded in the sense of it won't create spurious oscillations in region near the flow discontinuity, which is always the main issue of the implementation of high-order scheme. -khai ching- |
|
June 23, 2006, 04:47 |
Re: implicit scheme for time step
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your reading!
I found the resonant oscillation in my tube was not stable under the resonant frequency.It is not agree well with the literature. Is it the reason of scheme of time or other reasons? vivian |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | December 17, 2019 00:12 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Implicit Residual Smooth of Jameson Scheme | hhuang84 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 7, 2010 10:44 |
How to choose the CFL number with implicit scheme? | D.T. | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 23, 2002 14:56 |
Implicit Scheme for 1-D nozzle flow | Yogesh Talekar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 8, 1999 10:49 |