|
[Sponsors] |
June 20, 2006, 00:34 |
unsteady using SIMPLE algorithm
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I try to simulate the flow over a plunge NACA0012 using the SIMPLE algorithm and rigid moving grid with the airfoil. but it is hard to converge and the Cl & Cd are much larger than experiment data. who has experience about this problem?
|
|
June 21, 2006, 03:01 |
Re: unsteady using SIMPLE algorithm
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ok as u said convergence problems it could be worked out with the underrelaxtion factors (decreasing them too much can lead large computational time) but did u check all other conditions whether given properly even if mesh is too much refine this convergence problems come into field so try better with coarse grid to start off,u havent mentioned the flow solver u used.
Is it ur problem is unsteady with moving mesh can u define ur problem more clearly . if Cl ,Cd are monitoring parameters than they would finally settle down to correct values intially though they may fluctuate . |
|
June 21, 2006, 13:04 |
Re: unsteady using SIMPLE algorithm
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Have you validate your code!
|
|
June 24, 2006, 04:43 |
Re: unsteady using SIMPLE algorithm
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks! I use a in-house code that was validate many times before calculation this case.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates | zouchu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2014 18:02 |
SIMPLE algorithm confusion | lost.identity | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 7, 2010 12:48 |
The SIMPLE Algorithm | Hooman | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 8, 2010 23:55 |
SIMPLE algorithm for collocated storage | alex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | April 9, 2008 00:48 |
outflow boudary condition in SIMPLE algorithm | dallybird | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 6, 2003 12:55 |