|
[Sponsors] |
Can CFD problems be solved Parallely using Finite Element Method? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Sreejith
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Can we divide and conquer a CFD problem using FEM and process it in a cluster/grid?
I'm planning to maybe implement it on BOINC. I'm from a computer science background and not very familiar with fluid dynamics (although I've good understanding of calculus and very basic fluid dynamics equations). I've heard it is difficult to parallel compute CFD in distributed computing circles. Why is it so? Last edited by sreejith; April 14, 2013 at 15:27. Reason: Modified the question statement |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
Its not difficult to parallel processing of CFD code. Many commercial code exists with distributed and parallel processing. Even pre and post processing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 ![]() |
To your first question:
As I understand it you can use any way of solving the equations on a grid. But: In CFD, much efford is put into getting conserving equations. That is an inherent feature of the finite volume method and the reason why everyone uses it.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
It is not just a feature of the FV method, but of all integral methods. The main reason FV is used is because it can be stabilized so easily and is can deal with unstructured grids. But by far not everyone uses FV
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 ![]() |
Could you elaborate on this, cfdnewbie? I just have sparse knowledge about FEM, but I don't see how the equations can intrinsically conserve mass, like FV. Do you have any good paper about that?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
the answer is two-fold, I guess. First of all, you are starting from the integral form of the equations (like in FV), and then you are using a globally connected ansatz: elements share nodes at the faces, so like in FV, what goes in, must come out...you must take care of that in FV by ensuring the consistency of the fluxes at the interface.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,297
Rep Power: 27 ![]() |
I am not sure that I already got it... Do you know any good lecture notes?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
no, not really, sorry. What is still bothering you about it? Any global method (take Fourier Galerkin for example) conserves the conservation properties...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
computing, distributed parallel, finite element method |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces | tommymoose | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | December 1, 2020 11:12 |
[Other] Mesh Importing Problem | cuteapathy | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | June 24, 2017 05:29 |
2D Dam-Break model in finite element method, any experiences,comments,? | seyedashraf | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 2011 03:56 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 18:28 |
tidal flow simulation using finite volume method | Jason Qiu | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 20, 2002 02:34 |