|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
I am looking for a convection scheme with the following requierement
- structured grids - implicit finite volume (must allow large time step) - ideally 3rd order accurate - monotonic, positivity preserving - low speed, compressible flow I have implemented QUICK and whilst the deferred correction schemes improve the numerical stability of the linear systems, one of the fundamental problems of this scheme remains, with the solution field often exhibiting spurious, non-physical, oscillations. I am aware that Leonard has applied a number of flux–limiter schemes to the basic third order upwind biased method. Leonard efforts (both numerically and acronymically) lead to SHARP, ULTRA-SHARP, ULTIMATE, ULTIMATE QUICKEST, UTOPIA, NIRVANA, ENIGMATIC, MACHO, COSMIC and many other schemes. Other authors also contributed with their schemes and acronyms like UMIST and CHARM ... I must admit I am a bit confused about which scheme I should consider for my problem. Suggestion are welcome. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 134
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi, check out the book by Versteeg&Malalasekera 2nd Edition. In this revised and extended edition there's a whole section dedicated to TVD schemes where you'll find a bunch of flux limiter functions (Van Leer, SUPERBEE, Min-Mod, ...) as well as practical information as to how to implement them in your CFD code.
I hope it helps. Cheers, Michujo. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,830
Rep Power: 73 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
formally, any limiter applied on high order scheme degrades the accuracy near discontinuity... you must accept that ... I suggest also trying ENO/WENO schemes... |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 14 ![]() |
Quote:
EDIT : I also have a requierement to try to minimize the lenght of the stencil, which is not easy with ENO from what I understand. The TVD scheme with fixed stencil size is then probably the best solution for the moment. Last edited by bigorneault; February 7, 2013 at 11:30. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
limitation of coupled schemes in pressure based solver | ramkumar86 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | January 4, 2013 04:05 |
time stepping schemes for compressible DNS/LES | shyamdsundar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 14, 2010 23:15 |
incorrect temperature in pressure based solution | Kian | FLUENT | 1 | July 6, 2009 05:59 |
Pressure based and Density based Solver | Xobile | Siemens | 1 | November 30, 2004 21:13 |
Higher-order bounded convection schemes for pure advection with discontinuity | Anthony | Main CFD Forum | 3 | June 13, 1999 02:36 |