|
[Sponsors] |
method of manufactured solutions for unsteady problem |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 23, 2013, 04:42 |
method of manufactured solutions for unsteady problem
|
#1 |
New Member
James
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi all,
Is anyone familiar with the method of manufactured solutions? I using the method to evaluate my unsteady code. I needed to know if the code needs to be run for a long time. Cheers! |
|
January 23, 2013, 05:09 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
Not sure I'm getting your question. You chose a time-dependent function as a source, plug in it, evaluate the L2 norms at some time and then do the grid refinement...
|
|
January 23, 2013, 17:46 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Arjun
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Nurenberg, Germany
Posts: 1,286
Rep Power: 34 |
mail me your email, I will send you a paper and a note about how to do that in 3D. I recently was testing starccm against it. So have that paper i used.
|
|
January 24, 2013, 03:16 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 557
Rep Power: 20 |
or just google "sandia labs report manufactured solution", they have done some extensive testing with this method. You will find it done regularly in journal papers about new discretization methods, and it is pretty easy to do.
no witchcraft! Good luck! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Newtons method failed in Atomization Problem | a_cucen | CFX | 6 | April 16, 2013 22:57 |
FSI Problem - Utilizing ALE method to map solutions | natern | OpenFOAM | 1 | November 7, 2011 18:00 |
Difference between Lax and MacCormack methods on solutions of 1D problem. | AERO | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 19, 2000 15:36 |
extremely simple problem... can you solve it properly? | Mikhail | Main CFD Forum | 40 | September 9, 1999 10:11 |
use of MAC method to solve sloshing problem. | S.R.SAHI | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 15, 1999 23:28 |