|
[Sponsors] |
April 12, 2006, 16:42 |
turbulence modells
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have some questions to turbulence modelling. The one eq-modell from Spalart and Allmaras solves an additional equation for nu_t. (nu = nu + nu_t) 1. What would you say are the weaknesses compared to the k-epsilon-modell (2-eq-modell)? 2. f_1 is kind of a damper to assure that the turbulent viscosity dominates only in the mainstream. What is the difference between nu_t and nu_t^hat (I hope you understand what I mean - LATEX would be quite useful to make it clear...) Thanks. |
|
April 13, 2006, 07:24 |
it is more complex
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have read further books/manuals and I understood that nu_t_hat is simply a modified turb. kinetic viscosity which is used to solve the partial differential equation. The first term of the transport-eq. (on the right hand side) descripbes the production (G = C_b1*...*S*nu_t_hat) of turbulent viscosity. Near a solid wall the turb. viscosity is reduced to zero (production --> 0) - What happens with the destruction Y = f(nu_t_hat)? (I understand production as a tranformation of the energy from the mean velocity into turbulent fluctuations.) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence postprocessing | Mohsin | FLUENT | 2 | October 3, 2016 15:18 |
Question on Turbulence Intensity | Eric | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2012 05:30 |
Turbulence Modells - Overview | bastil | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | April 19, 2010 18:18 |
Discussion: Reason of Turbulence!! | Wen Long | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 15, 2009 10:52 |