|
[Sponsors] |
March 20, 2006, 08:17 |
hexahedral vs. tetrahedral cells
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe my other post ("Cell type litterature") had a uninteresting subject and did not get read. I'll try once more.
I am seeking references on litterature (books, articles, technical notes etc.) on cell type (tet, hex, poly) and their application, advantages and disadvantages from a numerically point of view. Any references to litterature discussing the cell type and its quality with reference to convergence and accuracy is of interest. |
|
March 20, 2006, 14:10 |
Re: hexahedral vs. tetrahedral cells
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There is a sister site on grid generation and it has a lot of articles on grid generation.Have a look at it .
|
|
March 21, 2006, 05:28 |
Re: hexahedral vs. tetrahedral cells
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have seen it. But unless I have overlooked something it is for grid generation only and not adressing the issues of grid type, density and quality with respect to the numerical result obtained as a CFD end-user.
|
|
March 21, 2006, 07:41 |
Re: hexahedral vs. tetrahedral cells
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Netgen] Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM | hsieh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 32 | September 13, 2011 06:50 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 22:11 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh aborting | Tobi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 10, 2010 04:23 |
[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh | chelvistero | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | January 15, 2010 20:43 |
physical boundary error!! | kris | Siemens | 2 | August 3, 2005 01:32 |