|
[Sponsors] |
March 18, 2006, 07:25 |
conservation & non-conservation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
the conservation & non conservation form of navier stoke equations are mathematically equal, but physically how we differntiate it?. can anyone expalin this..
|
|
March 18, 2006, 10:46 |
Re: conservation & non-conservation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Conservative is usually thought of as
rate of change of momentum = sum of forces, working on a fixed frame and looking at boundary fluxes and forces. Non-conservative is usually thought of as sum of forces = mass * acceleration, following a fixed collection of 'fluid particles' as it moves through time and space. Your thinking in deriving the two should be following the two concepts. It's an exercise in differing philosophies (at least for me). |
|
March 18, 2006, 12:57 |
Re: conservation & non-conservation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In Unsteady Fluid flow problems, the any flow quantities (mass, mom and ener)inside the domain will change based on contribution of time, space and convection.
If its Eulerian approach then our CV is fixed so we get a time effect and combined effect of (Space + Convection = flux)... so its called as conservation form If its Lagrangian approach then our CV is moving so we cant separate the effect of time and space... so now we get the convection and combined effect of (time + space = material derivative).. So its called as Non-Conservation form I understood in this way.. but i am not sure abt it.. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lost of mass conservation | jjchristophe | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2010 06:44 |
How about Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Canada? | morxio | Main CFD Forum | 14 | February 2, 2007 14:36 |
Conservation target in transient simulations | Target | CFX | 12 | September 25, 2006 08:20 |
Mass conservation | Diego Nogueira | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 30, 2004 16:50 |
Two-phase mass conservation ? | Michael R. Rasmussen | CFX | 3 | September 1, 2000 09:36 |