Discretization of advection-diffusion equation

Thomashoffmann · November 26, 2012, 04:29

Hi All.
My supervisor told me to write the advection-diffusion equation in discrete form. I have found it carried out in Suhas Patankars Book 'Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow', and I have attached the pages here.
But I can't figure out how he integrated over the control volume and found equation (5.50). Can one of you guys show me how the terms Je, Jw, Jn and Js looks?

Thanks

Thomas

michujo · November 26, 2012, 06:40

Hi, performing the integration of the flux terms over the control volume you get:
$\int_w^e\frac{\partial J_x}{\partial x}dx=\left. J_x\right|_w^e=J_e-J_w$ .
You just have to evaluate the flux terms at the boundaries of your control volume. So pick up expressions 5.49 (a) and (b) and evaluate them at the west. east, north and south boundaries of your cell.

Does it help?

Cheers.

Thomashoffmann · November 26, 2012, 07:46

This far I understand, but I would like to write it out in more details. Would you say the following evaluation is correct?

$J_e-J_w=(U_e\phi_e+\frac{\phi_e}{\Delta x})\Delta y-(U_w\phi_w+\frac{\phi_w}{\Delta y})\Delta x$

Thanks

michujo · November 26, 2012, 08:21

Hi, regarding the convective terms they are correctly formulated. For a staggered grid you have velocity directly available at the cell faces so you already know Ue and Uw. For the value of phi at the cell faces you'll have to use a discretization scheme. For instance if you use and upwind approximation phi_e will be the value of phi at the cell located left to the control cell (for positive Ue) and the value of phi at the control cell (for negative value of Ue, so flow going to the left).

The diffusive terms you wrote are wrong. You have to calculate the gradient at the cell (for example by using a centered scheme based on finite differences). The way you wrote it suggests that diffusive transport is proportional to the value of phi, whereas you know the diffusive flux is proportional to the gradient at that location, right?

Also you can choose to discretize both convective and diffusive terms at once, making use of an analytical expression, by using the exponential, power law or hybrid schemes (remember this is only strictly valid for 1D problems without source terms).

Anyway, all this is thoroughly described in Patankar's so you just have to look it up.

Cheers.

cdegroot · November 26, 2012, 08:45

Yes your gradient term is not right. Lets assume you interpolate correctly for $\phi_e$ and you are using a non staggered grid. Then

$J_e=\left(U_e\phi_e +\frac{\phi_E -\phi_P}{\Delta x}\right)\Delta y$

Where e refers to the east integration point P refers to the cell centre and E refers to the neighbour to the east. Hope that helps.

Thomashoffmann · November 26, 2012, 09:22

Thanks guys.

tgb · March 28, 2013, 01:27

Hi all,

I wrote code in Matlab but my advection term doesn't work.
I used FDM method, could u please help me.

It is said "Attempted to access q(37.95); index must be a positive integer or logical."
Probably, it is a parenthesis mistake, but i can't figure out, I am stuck here.
Could u please send me the original advection term for FDM?

In the class, we used adv as d(uu)/dx+d(uv)/dy in the x-dir and d(vu)/dx+d(vv)/dy in y-dir.

Please help!!!!!!

ad(iu(i,j))=((0.5.*(q(iu(i+1,j))+q(iu(i,j))))^2-(0.5.*(q(iu(i,j))+q(iu(i-1,j))))^2)/dx ...
+(0.25.*(q(iu(i,j+1))+q(iu(i,j))).*(q(iv(i,j+1)) + q(iv(i-1,j+1))) ...
-0.25.*(q(iu(i,j)+q(iu(i,j-1))).*(q(iv(i,j))+q(iv(i-1,j)))))/dy;

cdegroot · March 28, 2013, 08:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by tgb

Hi all,

I wrote code in Matlab but my advection term doesn't work.
I used FDM method, could u please help me.

It is said "Attempted to access q(37.95); index must be a positive integer or logical."
Probably, it is a parenthesis mistake, but i can't figure out, I am stuck here.
Could u please send me the original advection term for FDM?

In the class, we used adv as d(uu)/dx+d(uv)/dy in the x-dir and d(vu)/dx+d(vv)/dy in y-dir.

Please help!!!!!!

ad(iu(i,j))=((0.5.*(q(iu(i+1,j))+q(iu(i,j))))^2-(0.5.*(q(iu(i,j))+q(iu(i-1,j))))^2)/dx ...
+(0.25.*(q(iu(i,j+1))+q(iu(i,j))).*(q(iv(i,j+1)) + q(iv(i-1,j+1))) ...
-0.25.*(q(iu(i,j)+q(iu(i,j-1))).*(q(iv(i,j))+q(iv(i-1,j)))))/dy;

Well, the error is pretty clear. You are trying to use a real number (37.95) as an index to an array. My guess is that either iu or iv contains real numbers somewhere. What is the purpose of iu and iv? How do you define them?

andy_ · March 28, 2013, 08:58

Not sure if this thread is still alive but in response to the OP it is conventional to subtract phi_p * Continuity from the RHS in order for the coefficients to be in a more convenient form. Continuity of course should be zero. (Apologies if it says this in attached figure but it is too small for me to read.)

March 28, 2013, 01:27	Advection term	#7
tgb New Member tgb Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	Hi all, I wrote code in Matlab but my advection term doesn't work. I used FDM method, could u please help me. It is said "Attempted to access q(37.95); index must be a positive integer or logical." Probably, it is a parenthesis mistake, but i can't figure out, I am stuck here. Could u please send me the original advection term for FDM? In the class, we used adv as d(uu)/dx+d(uv)/dy in the x-dir and d(vu)/dx+d(vv)/dy in y-dir. Please help!!!!!! ad(iu(i,j))=((0.5.(q(iu(i+1,j))+q(iu(i,j))))^2-(0.5.(q(iu(i,j))+q(iu(i-1,j))))^2)/dx ... +(0.25.(q(iu(i,j+1))+q(iu(i,j))).(q(iv(i,j+1)) + q(iv(i-1,j+1))) ... -0.25.(q(iu(i,j)+q(iu(i,j-1))).(q(iv(i,j))+q(iv(i-1,j)))))/dy;

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out	saii	CFX	12	March 19, 2018 06:21
Calculation of the Governing Equations	Mihail	CFX	7	September 7, 2014 07:27
Spectral Element DG and the Convection Diffusion Equation	sspatelccny	Main CFD Forum	0	June 30, 2012 18:35
WENO Code (1D Advection Equation)	Carolyn	Main CFD Forum	6	March 11, 2007 14:21
transport (advection) equation	DJ	Main CFD Forum	0	February 21, 2005 12:18

November 26, 2012, 06:40		#2
michujo Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 134 Rep Power: 15	Hi, performing the integration of the flux terms over the control volume you get: $\int_w^e\frac{\partial J_x}{\partial x}dx=\left. J_x\right\|_w^e=J_e-J_w$ . You just have to evaluate the flux terms at the boundaries of your control volume. So pick up expressions 5.49 (a) and (b) and evaluate them at the west. east, north and south boundaries of your cell. Does it help? Cheers.

November 26, 2012, 07:46		#3
Thomashoffmann Member Thomas Hoffmann Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 67 Rep Power: 14	This far I understand, but I would like to write it out in more details. Would you say the following evaluation is correct? $J_e-J_w=(U_e\phi_e+\frac{\phi_e}{\Delta x})\Delta y-(U_w\phi_w+\frac{\phi_w}{\Delta y})\Delta x$ Thanks

November 26, 2012, 08:21		#4
michujo Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 134 Rep Power: 15	Hi, regarding the convective terms they are correctly formulated. For a staggered grid you have velocity directly available at the cell faces so you already know Ue and Uw. For the value of phi at the cell faces you'll have to use a discretization scheme. For instance if you use and upwind approximation phi_e will be the value of phi at the cell located left to the control cell (for positive Ue) and the value of phi at the control cell (for negative value of Ue, so flow going to the left). The diffusive terms you wrote are wrong. You have to calculate the gradient at the cell (for example by using a centered scheme based on finite differences). The way you wrote it suggests that diffusive transport is proportional to the value of phi, whereas you know the diffusive flux is proportional to the gradient at that location, right? Also you can choose to discretize both convective and diffusive terms at once, making use of an analytical expression, by using the exponential, power law or hybrid schemes (remember this is only strictly valid for 1D problems without source terms). Anyway, all this is thoroughly described in Patankar's so you just have to look it up. Cheers.

November 26, 2012, 08:45		#5
cdegroot Senior Member Chris DeGroot Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Canada Posts: 414 Rep Power: 18	Yes your gradient term is not right. Lets assume you interpolate correctly for $\phi_e$ and you are using a non staggered grid. Then $J_e=\left(U_e\phi_e +\frac{\phi_E -\phi_P}{\Delta x}\right)\Delta y$ Where e refers to the east integration point P refers to the cell centre and E refers to the neighbour to the east. Hope that helps.

November 26, 2012, 09:22		#6
Thomashoffmann Member Thomas Hoffmann Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 67 Rep Power: 14	Thanks guys.

March 28, 2013, 08:58		#9
andy_ Senior Member andy Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 308 Rep Power: 18	Not sure if this thread is still alive but in response to the OP it is conventional to subtract phi_p * Continuity from the RHS in order for the coefficients to be in a more convenient form. Continuity of course should be zero. (Apologies if it says this in attached figure but it is too small for me to read.)