|
[Sponsors] |
March 1, 2006, 23:51 |
Reynolds Number for Nozzle
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to compute the reynolds number for a Nozzle. The information I have at nozzle exit conditions is
Mach number M=0.90, Velocity U=285 m/s, Total Temp. T0=290K, Diameter D=0.56 in, Lip thickness 0.03 in. Can anyone please help me in finding the Reynolds number... Can I just go by the Re based on diameter? I want to find the first grid point distance from the wall for the grid representing the flow inside the nozzle. Thanks, Shyam |
|
March 2, 2006, 00:31 |
Re: Reynolds Number for Nozzle
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mr. Shyam Re=rho*U*D/Mu, So you need to know about properties of fluid i.e Mu. Assuming the flow in nozzle is quasi one dimensional calculate the Re using above expression.
|
|
March 2, 2006, 05:22 |
Re: Reynolds Number for Nozzle
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
But, is it ok to assume the nozzle as quasi one-dimensional nozzle? My doubt was, in case of turbulent boundary layers, is the Re calculation still applicable, or there are other forumulations?
|
|
March 2, 2006, 08:15 |
Re: Reynolds Number for Nozzle
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In order to assess whether you can assume a 1-D flow, we need more info about the shape of the nozzle. Is it conical, fluted ??? Also, assuming your talking about calculating your y+ value, why would someone come up with a turbulent wall function for a laminar flow? The method you use to calculate y+ depends on the turbulence model you are using. Getting the right y+ value is often an iterative process anyway, so make an estimate based on Re, pull out what y+ is, and adjusted it until you get something sensible.
|
|
March 2, 2006, 08:15 |
Re: Reynolds Number for Nozzle
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In order to assess whether you can assume a 1-D flow, we need more info about the shape of the nozzle. Is it conical, fluted ??? Also, assuming your talking about calculating your y+ value, why would someone come up with a turbulent wall function for a laminar flow? The method you use to calculate y+ depends on the turbulence model you are using. Getting the right y+ value is often an iterative process anyway, so make an estimate based on Re, pull out what y+ is, and adjusted it until you get something sensible.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem with decomposePar tool | vinz | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 18 | January 26, 2011 03:17 |
Reynolds Number and Heat transfer Coefficient | panos_metal | FLUENT | 0 | January 7, 2011 07:37 |
Low Reynolds Number k-epsilon formulation CFX 10.0 | Chris | CFX | 4 | December 8, 2009 00:51 |
Reynolds Number | Matt | CFX | 0 | February 25, 2009 06:40 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |