|
[Sponsors] |
February 23, 2006, 10:12 |
Fractional Step Method interpretation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
I am using the Fractional Step Method (FSM) for the first time, so I am really just trying to understand how it normally behaves. Despite some effort, I still cannot get it to work as it presumably should. In accordance with (Perot 1993, 1995) and (Zang, Street & Koseff, 1994), I discretize the equations before performing the FSM factorization. In practice, this means that the boundary conditions chosen for the velocity u are applied to u*; is this right? So if, as in my case, you have no-slip at the bottom and a Dirichlet (e.g. u=u0) at the top, then u* will tend toward zero at the bottom and toward u0 at the top. (Perhaps this is where my interpretation is wrong?) Then comes the pressure correction. If you already have u* tending toward 0 on the surface, then that would mean grad(p) should also tend toward 0 on the surface to yield u=0, i.e. constant pressure on the surface. As you point out, this does not make sense. How is one then supposed to apply the fractional step method? By the way, I use a non-staggered, non-orthogonal grid. Thanks in advance for your help! Jean-François |
|
February 27, 2006, 18:32 |
Re: Fractional Step Method interpretation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
>In practice, this means that the boundary conditions chosen for the velocity u are applied to u*
Correct. Both of the B.C.'s you describe are Dirichlet. >By the way, I use a non-staggered, non-orthogonal grid. The non-staggered grid is probably the issue. Many of the fraction step/pressure correction methods have issues (like limitation to normal velocity B.C.'s, for example) if you try to use a non-staggered discretization. There are some versions that stagger only some of the flow variables, but I'm not sure if these methods are still in use. Jason |
|
March 1, 2006, 11:38 |
Re: Fractional Step Method interpretation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Jean-Francois,
I have an article that I wrote (currently in press for the Journal of Computational Physics) where I spend some time really explaining the steps one has to follow with the fractional step method using a non-staggered, curvilinear, Finite volume approach. In addition, I discuss conservation issues (that might also be of interest to you). Therefore, shoot me an email at felten@research.ge.com so that I could email you my paper. Sincerely, Frederic |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MATLAB fractional step code | Darren | Main CFD Forum | 7 | September 25, 2018 15:58 |
Comparing between the Fractional step method and the SIMPLE method | ghlee | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 10, 2012 17:59 |
Any fractional step solver around | aldot | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 22, 2008 07:19 |
BC for Pressure Equation in Fractional Step Method | Márcio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 24, 2007 06:22 |
Fractional step in ALE form - possible? | Wee | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 3, 2006 11:20 |