|
[Sponsors] |
Question about number of processors shall I use to speed up the calculation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 3, 2012, 09:08 |
Question about number of processors shall I use to speed up the calculation
|
#1 |
Senior Member
lnk
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I send the simulation jobs to my company's processors for calculation. I mainly use CFX-solver and FineTM. I don't know anything about parallel computing yet. But I heard about more processors may even give lower calculation speed. May I ask how to decide the number of processors shall I use? |
|
October 3, 2012, 09:55 |
|
#2 |
New Member
AS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17 |
You'll need to ensure the the communication between processors is not causing a bottleneck. If you use too many processors, then your code will spend all its time communicating rather than solving.
A conservative estimate may be to use at least 100,000 cells per a cpu core, so if you have a 1M cell mesh, use no more than 10 CPUs. This will most certainly be enough to keep the CPU busy. That said, you will probably find acceptable performance as low as 20,000 cells/core if you have high end hardware connected with infiband. The optimum number depends a lot on the hardware and also how well the code scales, so there is no single answer, but the above figures should give you some idea. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mesh file for flow over a circular cylinder | Ardalan | Main CFD Forum | 7 | December 15, 2020 14:06 |
Reynolds Number Calculation | ashtonJ | CFX | 7 | October 14, 2013 18:26 |
How do I choose de number of processors with paraFoam? | CSN | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | April 17, 2012 05:44 |
GAMG Number of iterations depends strongly on number of parallel processors | clean-energy | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | April 12, 2012 04:23 |
Problem with decomposePar tool | vinz | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 18 | January 26, 2011 03:17 |