|
[Sponsors] |
Help with K-epsilon for 2D turbulence modelling |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 7, 2012, 06:59 |
Help with K-epsilon for 2D turbulence modelling
|
#1 |
New Member
Aditya Pandare
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I'm simulating a flow though an volute casing. I'm in the initial stages of showing grid independence. the k-epsilon model was working fine until the no. of elements was around 2.5 lakhs. in the 4 lakh element model im not getting a converged solution. the residuals for continuity are not stable now. I'm using the simple algorithm, with 2nd order upwind diff(used 1st order too; but same problem) 0.5 relaxation. its a single-phase flow. Please suggest ways to converge this solution. |
|
September 7, 2012, 08:46 |
Re : Help with K-epsilon for 2D turbulence modelling
|
#2 |
New Member
Orkun Temel
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi aditya.pandare
It seems to me that there are two possibilities : numerical diffusion problem or wrong near-wall treatment. For the case of near-wall treatment, as you probably know, when you fine you mesh near wall, you decrease the y_plus value of your closest cell to wall. If y_plus values had decreased under 5 or 6, you need to use enhanced wall functions to have solution for viscous sub-layer. I would think that there would be numerical diffusion problem if you had not the same issue with a higher order discretization scheme. Orkun |
|
September 7, 2012, 22:57 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
another possiblity:
change from single precesion to double precesion |
|
September 8, 2012, 03:13 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Aditya Pandare
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi orkun and ztdep! thnks for your reply!
I am getting a y+ value of around 3 to 4. So I am running a simulation using enhanced wall treatment. I will also run a double precision solution after this run! another question, how do we find the value of velocity gradient at the wall? since the velocity profile equations themselves are functions of friction velocity (which in turn is viscosity multiplied by velocity gradient at wall) thanks again |
|
September 8, 2012, 07:06 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Orkun Temel
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14 |
You can use wall shear stress to calculate velocity gradient, or you may calculate it by a UDF.
|
|
September 12, 2012, 06:10 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Aditya Pandare
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 14 |
even After using the enhanced wall treatment, the solution isnt converging. I am checking convergence on the basis of area-weighted avg along a line.
Is it because i'm using an "outflow" boundary condition? would a pressure outlet be more suitable? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 16 | March 4, 2017 09:30 |
SimpleFoam k and epsilon bounded | nedved | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 25, 2008 21:21 |
a book for turbulence modelling | Prapanj | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 21, 2007 06:13 |
Turbulence Modelling | Richard Keays | FLUENT | 2 | May 6, 2004 01:11 |
Multigrid Method in Turbulence Modelling | Bipin Lokhande | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 11, 1998 20:20 |