|
[Sponsors] |
January 3, 2006, 04:45 |
Setting Solution Limits
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This refers to supersonic flow over blunt cone. Knowing the inflow conditions i can estimate the stagnation pressure etc at the nose. If i set the maximum press in the "solution limit" option (Solve->controls->Limits) as staganation press i get a shock sticking to the nose....unphysical. However if i set the limit to say 2-3 times the staganation pressure...the contours are correct. This means that as flow evolves from initial conditions set (i.e iterations are going on), at some instant(s) the local flow is exceeding stagnation values.My question is why the intermediate max pres/den etc will exceed stagnation values as iteration progresses towards steady state? And what is the physics behind it?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
grid dependancy | gueynard a. | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2014 22:22 |
Redefining variables in fluent instead using limits (control solution) | akhlaghi | FLUENT | 0 | February 19, 2011 07:14 |
Steady solution from Transient simulations | wawa | FLUENT | 2 | November 9, 2010 18:44 |
How to avoid exceeding solution limits for tempera | xyx | FLUENT | 0 | February 12, 2006 12:43 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 02:16 |