|
[Sponsors] |
December 29, 2005, 00:07 |
results with parallel processing
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am solving an unsteady problem using linux cluster at six nodes. For comparison I started the solution (first few iterations)using the cluster and then started the solution using single computer. There was some difference in the printed residual values. Is this usual or something wrong has happened. I am using fluent 6.2.16.
Thanks |
|
December 29, 2005, 01:56 |
Re: results with parallel processing
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is possible that the residuals vary a little bit. When using domain decomposition you will introduce (in some way) an other iterative process, because the boundaries on the domain borders are only virtually, and are not fix. They will be updated e.g. each Iteration. So you have a weak disatvantage in convergence rate/behauviour in parallel mode. But this disatvantage is very small, it depends strongly on the solver settings, and implementation for parallel mode.
Because of this I would be suprised when you get the same residuals. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parallel processing of OpenFOAM cases on multicore processor??? | g.akbari | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 31 | November 1, 2017 10:25 |
Parallel Processing Set Up | virgilhowardson | FLUENT | 1 | May 11, 2009 01:54 |
parallel processing in numeca | sheeev koomaar | Fidelity CFD | 1 | August 18, 2006 03:35 |
Paradox in parallel processing | Vagelis | FLUENT | 0 | October 26, 2005 06:36 |
parallel processing | Nurul Murad | FLUENT | 2 | July 25, 2001 04:11 |