|
[Sponsors] |
RANS modelling of turbulent non-premixed flames |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 21, 2005, 13:34 |
RANS modelling of turbulent non-premixed flames
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, Am trying to model an axi-symmetric turbulent jet diffusion flame using the standard k-epsilon model, and closure provided by the steady laminar flamelet model through the densities. To match the axial evolution of velocity with the experiment, I had to increase the constant C_eps1 in the epsilon equation. By doing this, I got the correct decay of the axial velocity and mixture fraction. But, my variance of mixture fraction was severely underpredicted. The original constant predicted a faster decay of the axial velocity and mixture fraction, but, also resulted in the correct prediction of peak value for the variance. If anybody has come across a similar situation please send in your comments. Regards Bhargav
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Modelling of premixed combustion in a burner rig | ThomasS | FLUENT | 12 | September 7, 2018 14:07 |
Flamelet: Rans of turbulent non-premixed flames | AdidaKK | CFX | 0 | July 22, 2009 21:55 |
Stretch and Quenching in Premixed Turbulent Flames | JK | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 2, 2006 15:05 |
premixed turbulent combustion | ywh | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2002 05:20 |
Turbulent non premixed coal flames | IIN | CFX | 0 | November 7, 2000 13:53 |