|
[Sponsors] |
November 20, 2005, 11:29 |
k-w Turbulence model implementation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Friends,
I am working on the implementation of k-w turbulence model for 2d flows and I have a few problems, which I would like to clear. The turbulence model of Wilcox(1988) has been implemented by me in a coupled fasion, with implicit time stepping. 1. The code blows off after reaching a residue of 1e-4 on fine meshes. 2. k and w are becoming negative. There are a few references that talk about limiting k and w, but the procedure is not well explained. I believe that the blow up of the code and the simultaneous degradation in the contours is because of improper limiting. It would be a big help if anyone could clarfiy these doubts and/or point to references that contain substantial discussions in this regard. Thanks in advance, Suneesh |
|
November 21, 2005, 03:15 |
Re: k-w Turbulence model implementation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
normally the k starts attaining -ve value first.then obviously solution blows up. adopt linearisation of k -eqn. also ensure attainable convergence of the continuity eqn.
|
|
November 23, 2005, 11:12 |
Re: k-w Turbulence model implementation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There are a lot of lower limits on K and omega to prevent them below unphysical value. For example, From http://cfl3d.larc.nasa.gov/Cfl3dv6/cfl3dv6.html, CFL3d imposes the below limit on omega and K: If either nondimensional omega or non-dimensional K drops equal to or below 1.0e-20, they will be reset to 1.0e-20. From http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/winddocs...urbulence.html, WIND-US software sets kmin and εmin to 10âˆ'10 and 10âˆ'12, respectively. You can also find a more complicate formula to limit omega and K from www.taurus.dlr.de/user_guide/user_guide.pdf. Which way is the best rests on the problem you solve
|
|
November 23, 2005, 12:19 |
Re: k-w Turbulence model implementation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Peter Zhao and pkm,
Thanks for the suggestions. I shall check them out. I would also like to know if some upper limits are provided for k and w, and also like to know if there are limits on the eddy viscosity. Thanks in advance, Regards, Suneesh |
|
November 23, 2005, 18:35 |
experimetal or numerical data channel flow
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Friends
I am working on the simulation of turbulent mixed convection in vertical channel flow , I have validated my code for forced convection and the natural convection in a tall and square cavity, I want to validate my code for mixed o natural convection in the vertical channel flow, Please anyone can send to me experimental or numerical data for the validation code. sincerely thank a lot |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model | Michiel | CFX | 12 | January 25, 2010 04:20 |
turbulence model equation | Andy Chen | FLOW-3D | 4 | January 1, 2010 22:45 |
SA Turbulence model implementation | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 6, 2006 13:23 |
A reference on implementation of Spalart-Alam. Turbulence Model? | Mohammad Kermani | Main CFD Forum | 2 | December 26, 1999 03:56 |