|
[Sponsors] |
November 17, 2005, 12:25 |
TVD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I am wondering why it is when people are implementing TVD schemes for bounded variables like the mixture fraction in Combusting flows, why is it that they use the TVD criteria for the spatial derivatives, but often times not for the time derivatives? Surely this can still result in an unbounded solution? I have seen people to use Crank-Nicolson and Three Point Backward differences which are not TVD as well the 3rd order Runge-Kutta scheme (used by Osher) which is TVD. Can anyone explain this to me? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nvd / tvd | MichiB | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 8 | July 21, 2021 06:27 |
TVD ... | Questioner | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 7, 2006 09:54 |
4th and 5th Order TVD Runge-Kutta Methods | saygin | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 30, 2006 12:45 |
TVD etc.. | J. K. | Main CFD Forum | 9 | November 11, 2004 10:27 |
TVD Schemes | Matt Umbel | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 25, 2000 05:21 |