|
[Sponsors] |
November 9, 2005, 20:13 |
ADI-SOR convergance
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have written an ADI-SOR code and I guess it works fine for 1 X 1 meter domain. But when I decrease the dimensions to for example 10 microns by 10 microns, the convergance time will be very very long. I am solving a 2d rectangular problem, with heat flux at one side, and newtonian BC (h is not zero) at all other sides (All Newmann; no drichlei BCs). My question is, should lengths of the domain have any effect on convergance time? I appreciate any help. Thanks, Mohsen |
|
November 12, 2005, 21:05 |
Re: ADI-SOR convergance
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Convergence shouldn't be affected by lengths if the same dimensionless parameters are used. You might be getting into round off errors of computer because of too small numbers involved in calculation. If you normalize your equatinons, and solve the normalized equation, you may resolve the problem
wen |
|
November 14, 2005, 21:43 |
Re: ADI-SOR convergance
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Wen. My equations are non-dimensional and I am using double-precision vaiables. So you think I am doing ADI in a wrong way?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use SOR or ADI for solving the time dependent reynolds equation | Hermano | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 5, 2010 10:47 |
ADI implicit doesn't converge | George Papadakis | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 8, 2009 14:27 |
algo for ADI or fractional step scheme handling crossderivative terms | HaKu | Main CFD Forum | 8 | April 4, 2009 03:10 |
Adi in 2D???sos | xiegang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 14, 2003 09:04 |
ADI of N-S equations | Zhou Yongcheng | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 18, 2001 08:58 |