|
[Sponsors] |
October 30, 2005, 06:19 |
Re: further thoughts: acoustics and low mach numbe
|
#41 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
> What would you suggest for appropriate boundary-conditions where wave
: phenomena show themselves? Perhaps the simplest reasonable ones are those of Thompson (J. Comp. Phys. late 80s) but the subject has received a lot of attention during the 90s as CAA and general purpose compressible flow developed. > Do commercial solvers allow such boundary-conditions? I do not have direct experience but several of the fruitful areas like unsteady flow in compressor/turbine blading will require it and so I expect the answer is yes. |
|
November 3, 2005, 05:46 |
Re: further thoughts: acoustics and low mach numbe
|
#42 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello again! I overcame this problem that I had and everything is going perfectly. Thank you very much for your advice. I implemented my code for moving walls also and for pressure boundary conditions and it converges and the results are fine (without any scock-like regions). The problem was at the differencing scheme that I am using (hybrid).I did not include the temp div(u) in the Ap coefficient.What a silly thing to do... Nevermind...
|
|
November 3, 2005, 07:05 |
Re: further thoughts: acoustics and low mach numbe
|
#43 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well done... Good luck with your future research...
diaw... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WAVE Ricardo Software | CED | Main CFD Forum | 45 | May 31, 2019 05:24 |
Noise and Turbulence | Matthias | Main CFD Forum | 9 | May 11, 2001 05:38 |