CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

FEM vs FDM

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2005, 03:31
Default FEM vs FDM
  #1
Alf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, what are the basic advantages of finite elements method in comparison with finite differences method? Thanks.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2005, 08:30
Default Re: FEM vs FDM
  #2
Soheyl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The most considerable advantage of FEM is its great strength in the modeling of complex geometries.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2005, 15:47
Default Re: FEM vs FDM
  #3
CFD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think question is FEM vs FVM as all major codes are FVM. From user point of view FVM can handle complex geometry as easy as FEM.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2005, 22:53
Default Re: FEM vs FDM
  #4
Renato
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't know much about FVM but my very naive idea about this method tells me that FVM works with balance fluxes through the element faces while FEM works with interpolation and trial functions applied to the problem and integrated over the computational domain.

For FEM and FVM enthusiasts there is a formulation called CVFEM (Control Volume Finite Element Method) where some FEM and FVM properties are combined to produce a new approach that summarizes the main advantages of both methods (complex geometries and conservation properties, etc...).

I've been work with FEM but I could say that FVM is more "traditional" in the CFD's world. Most of FVM researchers point that FEM is not locally conservative for CFD problems, but this problem was already overcame by Hughes and co-workers recently (I'll post the complete reference for this subject later). It's an old and very fruitful source of discussion (and fighting...) among FEM and FVM - CFD researchers.

Regards

Renato.

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2005, 00:42
Default Re: FEM vs FDM
  #5
Praveen. C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is an old and recurring debate. Both FEM and FVM are good for problems with complex geometry. If you are interested in only second order schemes, then FVM is good. But going to higher order with FVM on unstructured grids is costly. FEM provides a better framework for this since you can also do p-adaptation, ie., locally increase the order of the basis functions. Recent schemes like Discontinuous Galerkin FEM and Spectral Volume/Difference schemes lie in between FEM and FVM and appear to be very attractive for higher order simulations necessary for LES/DNS on unstructured grids.
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2005, 15:03
Default Re: FEM vs FDM
  #6
CFD
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have heard that solution speed is the main reason fvm is prefered. Anybody have a comparison between fvm (fluent, starcd, cfx, icepak, flotherm, cfdace, floworks) and fem (fidap, cfdesign)?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
openfoam -> fem, fvm, fdm? tH3f0rC3 OpenFOAM 4 September 3, 2015 03:51
FDM vs FVM vs FEM in CFD analysis ck5285 FLOW-3D 1 September 1, 2009 11:51
Atleast 5 general Diffrences between FVM, FEM, FDM RAJ FLUENT 2 October 7, 2005 09:25
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 19:28
FEM vs FDM Jack Main CFD Forum 10 January 27, 2002 11:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:16.