|
[Sponsors] |
October 20, 2005, 11:25 |
Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
If I want to simualte a case with Ma >5, which software is better, Fluent or CFX? Or another one? Thanks. yflin |
|
October 20, 2005, 15:11 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I heard that the energy equation is buggy in CFX. This can be tested on an simple throttle where enthalpy should be constant but it's not with CFX. I repeat: This is what I heard but I haven't tested on my own. If true, you'd prefer Fluent for Ma > 5 - Alan |
|
October 27, 2005, 06:24 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Certainly Fluent is the best, if Ma>5 then it can involve a thicker turbulent BL that SST (code CFX employs) many not be as effective as RNG k-E Method (code Fluent Employs).
|
|
October 28, 2005, 12:19 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Or of course you could use STAR-CCM+ which has got a nice coupled solver and both SST and K-E
|
|
October 28, 2005, 18:55 |
Re: Fluent or CFX if Ma >5 ?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Try the following two CFD tools that ESI-CFD offers:
CFD-FASTRAN: Developed for high speed aerodynamics http://www.esi-group.com/SimulationS...e/CFD_Fastran/ PAM-FLOW: Developed for high speed flows and aero-acoustics http://www.esi-group.com/SimulationS...ero_acoustics/ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 03:54 |
Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 14:14 |
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX | marco | Main CFD Forum | 81 | March 31, 2009 15:22 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 05:13 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 16:02 |