|
[Sponsors] |
October 18, 2005, 18:14 |
different grid spacing along each axis
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi folks,
I am wondering if anybody knows of issues (in a finite volume formulation) with making dx=dy, but dz=something else. dx will be the same along the entire x axis, as will dy and dz along their respective axes, but dz will simply be a larger number, like 5*dx. I don't see any reason that this should cause issues, but want to know what issues I may need to anticipate. I think the code should still be conservative as all finite volume codes are. But can this possibly cause other issues like numerical diffusion? Slow down convergence? I can't find any references on this. The closest thing I see is discussion of how changing grid spacing ALONG an axis will lower the order of a method (i.e. - central difference becomes O(dx) not O(dx^2) because the errors do not cancel in a nonuniform grid). The only thing I can see is that it will probably take longer to converge (I am using the SIMPLER algorithm). Any help or references would be appreciated. Thanks! Best, Jon |
|
October 18, 2005, 23:17 |
Re: different grid spacing along each axis
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi there,
you may to check for publication dealing with the impact of cell aspect ratio. From my experience, the greater the AR the slower the convergence. Now, just something to think about: if your dx, dy and dz are all constant, then you may want to investigate Spectral methods instead of FV. Sincerely, Fred Felten |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] Grid spacing calculator | aamer | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | November 28, 2010 20:54 |
conjugateHeatFoam, grid spacing and gradient calculation | benk | OpenFOAM | 1 | May 5, 2010 17:06 |
Grid Spacing Calculation | Zweeper | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | February 7, 2010 10:47 |
Using grid spacing calculator for laminar flow | CH | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 5, 2006 01:02 |
Combustion Convergence problems | Art Stretton | Phoenics | 5 | April 2, 2002 06:59 |