|
[Sponsors] |
October 11, 2011, 11:56 |
looking for a cluster to run a case
|
#1 |
Member
Miles
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 15 |
HI
I have a multiphase case on Openfoam 2.0.1. Actually I am running it on a 12 cores PC under ubunutu-linux. The total human time for the simulation on such a machine should be 15 days (360h). I need to speed up the resolution. Case feature initial file size : 200Mo Results : 200Mo*30 saves => approx. 6Go Does anyone know where and how I can find some solution to run it on a supercluster? Regards, Sydney TEKAM |
|
October 11, 2011, 18:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 22 |
How many cells does your case contain?
|
|
October 12, 2011, 05:39 |
|
#3 |
Member
Miles
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 15 |
not that much: one million.
the problem is my simulation are unsteady. |
|
October 12, 2011, 07:14 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Philipp
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
cloudnumbers.com offers computing resources also for Openfoam. But I didn't try it myself. Cheers |
|
October 20, 2011, 23:57 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 636
Rep Power: 22 |
That's what I thought, the cell count is too low.
Just imagine, you've got a transportation task to solve. You've got 12 vans to do this, every van has to drive the route only once to finish the job. Now you find out, it takes to long. Do you think you will get a significant speedup when using 100 vans? No one of this vans can drive faster due to the speed limit, so it only might take longer due to a self-caused traffic jam... Translated to your problem: With that low cell count you will not get a significant speedup when using a cluster. You've got only 80 000 cells per core, which is about the lower limit to use per core. When further reducing the cells per core, the solution will even take LONGER, as communication effort increases. Maybe you could go down to 60 000 cells per core as it is a multiphase flow, but you will never obtain a speedup of factor 2 or 3 just by using more cores. Unsteady simulations always need some time. As long as it is no trivial testcase, it takes enough time for the user to get impatient. This doesn't make happy, but is close to a law of nature. |
|
October 24, 2011, 15:06 |
|
#6 |
Member
Miles
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks a lot for this clear explanation.
You saved me a lot of effort! Regards, Miles |
|
March 3, 2012, 19:08 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United Kigdom
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 15 |
Is there one for Ansys Fluent too?
thanks |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
use batch mode to run an unsteady case | PaulineP | FLUENT | 9 | April 4, 2019 09:18 |
Working directory via command line | Luiz | CFX | 4 | March 6, 2011 21:02 |
how to parallel run in moving mesh case | ELYOR | Siemens | 5 | June 16, 2008 04:23 |
Run in parallel a 2mesh case | cosimobianchini | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | January 11, 2007 07:33 |
Cluster run without master node | Mikhail | CFX | 4 | September 29, 2005 09:58 |