Graphics cards

grtabor · July 20, 2009, 06:03

Hi everyone.

I have some money to spend on a new postprocessing workstation; I'm looking at a dual Xeon machine with 48GB RAM for looking at really big datasets. I have a choice of graphics cards, and I'm uncertain which to go for. I usually just choose the most expensive one I can afford, which in this case is the nVidia Quadro FX3700 with 512MB GDDR3. However I happened to notice that the machine can also be supplied with an nVidia GTX295 which provides 1792MB GDDR3; at around 1/2 the cost of the Quadro card. I understand that the Quadro cards are intended as "professional" cards; whilst the GTX series are "gaming" cards; the sysadmin here in Exeter recommends going for the Quadro as being more robust as a result. However I wonder, given the large datasets I am intending to process on this machine, whether the GTX card would be better, simply as a consequence of the large memory associated with its GPU. Does anyone have any guidance/recommendations/experience with any of this that they would be able to share with me, please?

Gavin

Onda · July 24, 2009, 08:02

I've never used a workstation so powerfull. My advice could be useless!.
In any case I think the choice of Video Card depend on choiche of PrePost software you use.
There are some software that could run with a gaming card without problems and others that crash often if used with a video card.
It depend also on wich OS you run.
this link could be interesting for you:
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539

Onda

bramv101 · July 29, 2009, 04:45

basicly gaming cards will try to maintain a certain frame rate by dropping detail if demands are to high.
Pro cards do the exact opposite, they are dedicated to maintaining detail at all cost.

Is the price off a pro card justified, in most cases no ( you can use a game card) However in the other cases where your drivers dont support your thing, you where going to wish you had bought that pro card.

So make sure up front if you can do it with a gaming card

Amiga500 · July 29, 2009, 06:40

There is an archived article on tomshardware.co.uk dealing with this. I recommend you go do a search of their site for it.

The upshot of it is, a much cheaper workstation graphics card (at ~£150) will outperform a top of the line desktop card.

I was surprised too.

Maddin · July 30, 2009, 10:03

Some gamer cards can used with a modified driver to become a very good CAD card!

July 20, 2009, 06:03	Graphics cards	#1
grtabor Senior Member Gavin Tabor Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 181 Rep Power: 17	Hi everyone. I have some money to spend on a new postprocessing workstation; I'm looking at a dual Xeon machine with 48GB RAM for looking at really big datasets. I have a choice of graphics cards, and I'm uncertain which to go for. I usually just choose the most expensive one I can afford, which in this case is the nVidia Quadro FX3700 with 512MB GDDR3. However I happened to notice that the machine can also be supplied with an nVidia GTX295 which provides 1792MB GDDR3; at around 1/2 the cost of the Quadro card. I understand that the Quadro cards are intended as "professional" cards; whilst the GTX series are "gaming" cards; the sysadmin here in Exeter recommends going for the Quadro as being more robust as a result. However I wonder, given the large datasets I am intending to process on this machine, whether the GTX card would be better, simply as a consequence of the large memory associated with its GPU. Does anyone have any guidance/recommendations/experience with any of this that they would be able to share with me, please? Gavin

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Best graphics card	grtabor	OpenFOAM	2	July 23, 2009 12:02
ANIMATIONS IN BATCH MODE	Arianna	FLUENT	1	January 31, 2008 10:04
Graphics Problem	Ryan	FLUENT	0	January 18, 2006 10:57
How to change and fix the size of graphics window?	Rob	FLUENT	1	February 7, 2003 11:15
Problem: graphics display in prostar main window	Jiaying Xu	Siemens	8	February 14, 2002 09:08

July 24, 2009, 08:02		#2
Onda New Member Stefano Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 17	I've never used a workstation so powerfull. My advice could be useless!. In any case I think the choice of Video Card depend on choiche of PrePost software you use. There are some software that could run with a gaming card without problems and others that crash often if used with a video card. It depend also on wich OS you run. this link could be interesting for you: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=539 Onda

July 29, 2009, 04:45		#3
bramv101 Member TonyD Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 85 Rep Power: 17	basicly gaming cards will try to maintain a certain frame rate by dropping detail if demands are to high. Pro cards do the exact opposite, they are dedicated to maintaining detail at all cost. Is the price off a pro card justified, in most cases no ( you can use a game card) However in the other cases where your drivers dont support your thing, you where going to wish you had bought that pro card. So make sure up front if you can do it with a gaming card

July 29, 2009, 06:40		#4
Amiga500 Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 36 Rep Power: 17	There is an archived article on tomshardware.co.uk dealing with this. I recommend you go do a search of their site for it. The upshot of it is, a much cheaper workstation graphics card (at ~£150) will outperform a top of the line desktop card. I was surprised too.

July 30, 2009, 10:03		#5
Maddin Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 260 Rep Power: 18	Some gamer cards can used with a modified driver to become a very good CAD card!