CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

EPYC 7551p vs dual Xeon Gold 6126

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 11, 2023, 02:42
Default EPYC 7551p vs dual Xeon Gold 6126
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 15
y2k_o__o is on a distinguished road
My main workstation is a Xeon W3-2435 with 8x 8GB DDR4-2933 for design work + drawings, but I also want to build a 2nd machine just purely for CFD so that it doesn't occupy my main workstation. The majority of work I do is Solidwork Flow simulation with roughly about 30-60 million cells per simulation.

I was given a pair of Xeon Gold 6126 (2 x 12C/24T) for free that I want to make use of it as a CFD machine, but I have researched that dual LGA3647 boards aren't cheap. On ebay, a cheap combination of Supermicro board + EPYC 7551p are roughly about the same of a used dual LGA3647 board.

I already have a lot of 16GB Crucial DDR4-2666 RDIMM that I plan to populate the 2nd workstation full dimm slot. With the same amount of memory, will I have quicker result with dual 6126 (2x12C/24T)or 7551p (32C/64T) ?

Assuming I am populated full dimm slot with memory. Here's the maximum memory bandwidth I can get:
Dual Xeon Gold 6126 (Hexa) - 2x 119.21GB/s = roughly 240 GB/s
7551p (Octa) - 158.95 GB/s

What's an estimated simulation time for 30 million cells?
y2k_o__o is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2023, 03:50
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,426
Rep Power: 49
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
I think the dual Xeon system will serve you much better.
It has more memory bandwidth, faster cores, and a less complicated NUMA topology with lower latency. So even in traditional CFD solvers like OpenFOAM, it should be faster. And Solidworks flow solver might not behave quite so nicely, so the last two points on that list are particularly important.

I know how much it sucks that the motherboards are so expensive. But in the end, you say both options are about the same total cost. And quite frankly, 1st gen Epyc in 2023 just isn't worth it. Total performance and price/performance of later generations is so much better. Coming from someone who is still using 1st gen Epyc in my main workstation.

I can't really estimate how long a simulation will take. There are just too many variables here, and I don't know much about Solidworks Flow.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2023, 18:24
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Daniel
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 2
moving-boundaries is on a distinguished road
You can plug dual 6126 into older workstations like Lenovo P720/P920, Dell T7820/T7920, HP Z6/Z8 G4. I think you can get one of those barebones for around $200-300 (e.g. https://pcserverandparts.com/build-y...0-workstation/)
moving-boundaries is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Xeon Gold Cascade Lake vs Epyc Rome - CFX & Fluent - Benchmarks (Windows Server 2019) SLC Hardware 18 June 13, 2020 16:48
Intel xeon gold vs AMD epyc build recommendations? ahmedna8 Hardware 9 January 18, 2020 23:12
New 128 mini cluster - Cascade Lake SP or EPYC Rome? SLC Hardware 8 December 16, 2019 16:25
Xeon Gold workstation config. Blanco Hardware 14 June 8, 2019 01:55
Dual Xeon E5-2687W v3 or i7-5960X? DoeBoy Hardware 1 August 25, 2015 15:44


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:16.