CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

7900X3D hoping for future 2x64 DDR5 memory?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 10, 2023, 16:42
Default 7900X3D hoping for future 2x64 DDR5 memory?
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
mespinil is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

I have a budget of 2k€ to make a general-purpose computer mainly for FEM and CFD. It is kind of annoying to have programs I need at work I cannot practice with at home because I have a mid tier 4 years old laptop, but it is not meant for super continuous or heavy use.

This is my first iteration:

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 4.4GHz/5.6GHz (579€)
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600MHz 64GB 2x32GB CL40 (184€)
Motherboard: Gigabyte B650 GAMING X AX (224€)
SSD: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB SSD NVMe M.2 (49€)
Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S chromax.black (110€)
PSU: Gigabyte UD850GM PG5 850W 80 Plus Gold Full Modular (104€)
GPU: MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X OC LHR 12GB GDDR6 (300€)

For a grand total of 1870€ after Windows installation and delivery.

Many questions and any help related to component price, compatibility or reputability is appreciated (first ever build). The one main concern I have though:

Based on this thread, right now 12 cores with 64 GB is wasting cores. My intention is to substitute this 2x32 GB RAM for 2x64 GB which should be in the ballpark of an efficient system. I could not find anything about 2x64GB being impossible in terms of architecture but neither about them being released anytime soon or ever. It is not a priority for me to get 128 GB, I can wait for them to get released and cheap.

Any opinion on whether this is a good idea at all?
mespinil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2023, 22:35
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Will Kernkamp
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 371
Rep Power: 14
wkernkamp is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mespinil View Post
Hi everyone,


....


Based on this thread, right now 12 cores with 64 GB is wasting cores. My intention is to substitute this 2x32 GB RAM for 2x64 GB which should be in the ballpark of an efficient system. I could not find anything about 2x64GB being impossible in terms of architecture but neither about them being released anytime soon or ever. It is not a priority for me to get 128 GB, I can wait for them to get released and cheap.

Any opinion on whether this is a good idea at all?
The limiting factor for your cores is the bandwidth, not the capacity. How much Memory do the problems that you want to run use on your work computers? Easy to check and should answer your question whether 64 GB is sufficient or not.
wkernkamp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2023, 00:01
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 208
Rep Power: 16
CFDfan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mespinil View Post
Hi everyone,

CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D 4.4GHz/5.6GHz (579€)

Any opinion on whether this is a good idea at all?
The CPU is only a dual memory bandwidth. Knowing that the memory bandwidth is the bottleneck of the CFD solver I don't know if a dual channel CPU would be a good choice
CFDfan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OpenFOAM benchmarks on various hardware eric Hardware 817 Yesterday 23:07
General recommendations for CFD hardware [WIP] flotus1 Hardware 19 June 23, 2024 19:02
Used Memory Accumulates During Course of Simulation Until interFoam gets Killed Ship Designer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 October 6, 2023 02:26
Workstation Suggestions For A Newbie mrtcnsmgr Hardware 1 February 22, 2023 02:13
CPU for Flow3d mik_urb Hardware 4 December 4, 2022 23:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25.