|
[Sponsors] |
AMD EPYC 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) vs 7301 (64 MB cache)? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 9, 2018, 16:00 |
AMD EPYC 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) vs 7301 (64 MB cache)?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 8 |
Very impressed with the performance from Epyc here.
I'm trying to save $300 on my FloTHERM build by using the 7281 (32 MB L2 cache) instead of the 7301 (64 MB cache). Think the cache size difference matters for CFD? I'm guessing not. Maybe it does for Keyshot (ray-tracing) however. Last edited by wyldckat; November 12, 2018 at 18:06. Reason: Gave link to the thread where this had been posted originally |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD Epyc CFD benchmarks with Ansys Fluent | flotus1 | Hardware | 55 | November 12, 2018 06:33 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper vs Intel Xeon, importance of cache and memory channels | JohnMartinGodo | Hardware | 4 | March 21, 2018 13:07 |
DPMFoam - Serious Error --particle-laden flow in simple geometric config | benz25 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 27 | December 19, 2017 21:47 |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
OpenFOAM 13 AMD quadcore parallel results | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | November 11, 2007 00:23 |