|
[Sponsors] |
August 2, 2018, 23:15 |
Single Socket 7401 EPYC
|
#1 |
New Member
Matt
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone out there has benchmarked an EPYC 7401P single socket setup. Given the EPYC procs already have 8 memory channels, is upgrading to a dual socket system worth the money? I am currently looking to build a EPYC workstation for OpenFoam, and a single socket 24-core 7401P setup runs about $4600, while a dual proc 7301 setup is a bit over $5800. I imagine the memory bandwidth is the crux of the single socket setup, however I haven't seen a benchmark for the 24-core system. |
|
August 3, 2018, 05:30 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
I haven't benchmarked a single-socket Epyc with 24 cores. But based on an educated guess. you will get more than your money's worth for using dual-socket 7301 instead.
OpenFOAM benchmarks on various hardware Somewhere buried in this thread we had dual-socket 7301 running 16 cores distributed on both CPUs vs. 16 cores pinned to one CPU: 66s vs. 84s. Confirmed by similar results on a machine with only one 16-core CPU. So clearly, already 16 cores begin to get limited by memory bandwidth of 8 channels (and maybe to some lower extent by cache size). |
|
Tags |
epyc, openfoam, single-socket |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD Epyc CFD benchmarks with Ansys Fluent | flotus1 | Hardware | 55 | November 12, 2018 06:33 |
999999 (../../src/mpsystem.c@1123):mpt_read: failed:errno = 11 | UDS_rambler | FLUENT | 2 | November 22, 2011 10:46 |
Single Droplet_VOF ANSYS 13 | MDinc | FLUENT | 0 | July 19, 2011 15:14 |
How to export single variable of a single surface? | zeitistgeld | CFX | 6 | September 26, 2009 07:37 |
P4 1.5 or Dual P3 800EB on Gibabyte board | Danial | FLUENT | 4 | September 12, 2001 12:44 |