Kernel for new CPUs

Simbelmynë · January 4, 2018, 11:20

Oh, I was

But at the same time I became interested in testing a larger system on my different setups. I guess the dual Epyc would complete the test in less than 15 minutes?

flotus1 · January 5, 2018, 16:02

With N=100 on 32 cores:

Code:

real    11m46.610s
user    358m42.870s
sys     15m52.321s

Simbelmynë · January 5, 2018, 17:41

Sweet! So the speed advantage increased to almost 150% over the Threadripper. I guess I need to get my hands on a dual Epyc system soon

Any information about Zen+ that is due Q1 this year? Perhaps it will make AMD even more affordable.

January 5, 2018, 16:02		#22
flotus1 Super Moderator Alex Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Germany Posts: 3,427 Rep Power: 49	With N=100 on 32 cores: Code: real 11m46.610s user 358m42.870s sys 15m52.321s

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Comparison between Intel CPUs Xeon E5-2643 v4 and Intel i7 5820K	mechy	Hardware	11	August 17, 2016 04:47
win7 can read only 2 CPUs	Anna Tian	Hardware	11	August 20, 2014 23:34
correction of Grub after installing Windows XP and 8	immortality	Lounge	20	January 5, 2014 18:41
CFX on different number of CPUs	cstebbings	CFX	1	April 19, 2011 14:01
Fluent benchmakrs on new Intel CPUs	cfdmystic	FLUENT	1	February 15, 2008 07:28

January 4, 2018, 11:20		#21
Simbelmynë Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 551 Rep Power: 16	Oh, I was But at the same time I became interested in testing a larger system on my different setups. I guess the dual Epyc would complete the test in less than 15 minutes?

January 5, 2018, 17:41		#23
Simbelmynë Senior Member Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 551 Rep Power: 16	Sweet! So the speed advantage increased to almost 150% over the Threadripper. I guess I need to get my hands on a dual Epyc system soon Any information about Zen+ that is due Q1 this year? Perhaps it will make AMD even more affordable.