CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Hardware

Hardware suggestion for running 40M cells

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 20, 2014, 19:31
Default Hardware suggestion for running 40M cells
  #1
New Member
 
Darshan
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14
dv.darshan is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I have been running CFD simulation for more than 1.5 years but it had always been small cases of about 5M cells and I was running either on desktop or laptop. Currently, I am in need to perform simulation of a problem of about 40M elements, RANS calculation and to be able to finish in 1 or 2 days. Could you please suggest me the details for building the workstation? such as, what is kind of RAM amount and number of parallel cores I would be needing to perform simulations within such time limit?

Since, I am very new to this size problems I am unaware of the requirements and your suggestions will be really helpful.
dv.darshan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 5, 2014, 18:44
Default
  #2
ski
New Member
 
AS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 17
ski is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv.darshan View Post
Hello everyone,

I have been running CFD simulation for more than 1.5 years but it had always been small cases of about 5M cells and I was running either on desktop or laptop. Currently, I am in need to perform simulation of a problem of about 40M elements, RANS calculation and to be able to finish in 1 or 2 days. Could you please suggest me the details for building the workstation? such as, what is kind of RAM amount and number of parallel cores I would be needing to perform simulations within such time limit?

Since, I am very new to this size problems I am unaware of the requirements and your suggestions will be really helpful.
This is all very subjective, but here are some rough numbers to give you some idea. 40M cells will probably need in the region of 40GB ram. This depends a lot on how many transport equations, mesh type (polyhedral need more than structured hexa for example), etc.

Nobody can tell you how many cores you will need to finish a calculation in 2 days. It is impossible to know from the information you provide since it will depend steady/unsteady, number of iterations/time-steps required for convergence, transport equations, quality of mesh (poor quality will need more iterations on the pressure), etc. etc.

I can however tell you that 40M cells will, for most codes, scale to ~400 cores which is a cluster, not a workstation. And that will be with infiniband interconnect. If you really plan on running 40M on a workstation I think you will, for practical reasons, be limited to steady RANS at a push.
ski is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2014, 11:42
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Derek Mitchell
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK, Reading
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 13
derekm is on a distinguished road
from what I have read here
(cores*50E3)< cells < (Memory/1E3)
__________________
A CHEERING BAND OF FRIENDLY ELVES CARRY THE CONQUERING ADVENTURER OFF INTO THE SUNSET
derekm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
hardware, hpc, parallel computing, rans, workstation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[mesh manipulation] how should we remove the Concave cells from the mesh? s.m OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 20 March 5, 2020 17:35
neighbouring cells kaokanya Siemens 1 October 13, 2003 06:21
meshing F1 front wing Steve FLUENT 0 April 17, 2003 13:37
Ignore cells on partition boundary Karl FLUENT 7 May 11, 2002 23:12
UDF: neighbour cells, upwind cells Dmitriy Makarov FLUENT 0 February 18, 2001 14:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13.