|
[Sponsors] |
Difference between processor CPU core in parallel launch |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 31, 2013, 20:53 |
Difference between processor CPU core in parallel launch
|
#1 |
New Member
Alessandro
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Italia
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
I don't understand very well the difference between "core" and "processor", so I am a bit confused in determining what is the maximum number of "processors" that I should consider for a parallel launch. I was testing a machine with: 16 processors Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 0 @ 2.70Ghz therefore in my openFOAM test case I tried a simulation with 16 processors. Code:
runParallel rhoSimpleFoam 16 Then I realized that each CPU E5-2680 has apparently 8 cores: http://ark.intel.com/products/64583/ does it mean that I can consider each core as a "processor" and run an analysis in parallel with 16 * 8 = 128 "processors" ? Now I was testing Code:
runParallel rhoSimpleFoam 128 Can I conclude: max "processor" number for parallel analysis = number of multicore processors * number of cores for each processor is it right? Regards Ale |
|
November 16, 2013, 12:14 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 17 |
All modern cpu's today have more than one core. Each core can be considered a processor. If you have 16 cpu's and each cpu is built from 8 cores then you should be able to run 16x8=128 parallel processes.
|
|
Tags |
runparallel rhosimplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sliding interface in parallel | Ivanet | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | March 25, 2019 03:04 |
solving a conduction problem in FLUENT using UDF | Avin2407 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | March 13, 2015 03:02 |
How many licenses for dual core processors? | bob | Siemens | 9 | August 15, 2006 09:12 |
FEDORA CORE and PARALLEL processing | Tuks | CFX | 2 | August 20, 2005 12:05 |
Parallel with Windoze, speed difference between PV | Charles | CFX | 3 | March 10, 2005 02:25 |