|
[Sponsors] |
March 22, 2012, 07:01 |
Particle Transport and Mesh Cell Size
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Stuart
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 739
Rep Power: 26 |
Hi,
For an incompressible flow with particle tracking is there guidelines on how small mesh cells should be? For example: should a mesh be sized so that a particle is expected to move cross a cell face per time step? Or perhaps move every 2nd timestep? Thanks |
|
March 22, 2012, 08:58 |
|
#2 |
Member
Domenico
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 15 |
hi
it probably depends on the particle properties, e.g. dimension, velocity. for example, very small and slow particles would need a highly refined mesh, of the order of the particles themselves, to ensure they can move at least in one cell/time step, but this would probably mean to use a four-way coupling between the fluid and the particles (solving for the turbulence of wakes around the particles), which isn't allowed in the DPM point-particle tracking (where the particle volume fraction is neglected). on the other hand, a highly refined mesh would allow the Fluent particles, which are cluster of particles, to represent a more realistic mass of actual particles regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transport mesh from ICEM CFD, to Fluent, to Sysnoise | Wieland | FLUENT | 2 | April 15, 2012 07:28 |
Instability in transport solution on tet mesh | mpeti | OpenFOAM | 5 | October 18, 2011 12:25 |
Questions for a species transport problems (snapshots attached) | aleisia | FLUENT | 2 | October 9, 2011 05:40 |
InterDyMfoam gives strange gamme if cell volume changes due to mesh motion | daniels | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | April 7, 2009 10:31 |
Phase locked average in run time | panara | OpenFOAM | 2 | February 20, 2008 15:37 |