|
[Sponsors] |
Boundary Conditions for Centrifugal Pump Analysis |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 26, 2012, 12:40 |
Boundary Conditions for Centrifugal Pump Analysis
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi there,
New to the CFD scene and looking for some guidance. I've got the geometry of a centrifugal pump (not just an impeller) and am looking to generate a head-flow curve in Fluent and compare against the manufacturer's curve I have. My problem arises when deciding what boundary conditions to use for the inlet and outlet. Any ideas/suggestions would be great! Cheers |
|
January 26, 2012, 15:34 |
|
#2 |
Member
David Stanbridge
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 16 |
Are you planning on a SRF or an MRF simulation? I would suggest you use a velocity inlet as then you know exactly how much flow you are feeding the pump and for the outlet use "OUtflow". If the outlet of the model is close to the outlet of the impeller a pressure outlet can adversely affect the flow characteristics you see. If you have reverse flow in the outflow then move the outlet of the model further from the outlet of the pump.
|
|
January 26, 2012, 16:01 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks for responding!
I'm using a MRF. I've seen papers and other places suggesting using mass flow (inlet) and static pressure (outlet) or total pressure (inlet) and static pressure (outlet) but I'm having problems defining what these are. If I choose to use the velocity inlet then what do you suggest I should be using as the gauge pressure in the inlet boundary screen? Also, if I were to go for a pressure (outlet) BC, what would be the pressure utilised here? Finally (apologies) - should this be conducted as a transient analysis? Thanks in advance for any more info! |
|
January 26, 2012, 16:52 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 15 |
MRF is more suitable for a steady state simulation. On the other hand sliding mesh technique is designed for a transient simulation. Needless to say that transient method is more time consuming. So you might want to start with steady state and see how it goes.
|
|
January 27, 2012, 09:39 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks for the info.
I'm having a look at doing this a few different ways, currently using pressures for the inlet and outlet. Most literature is states the following: Inlet - 'total' pressure Outlet - 'static' pressure Can anyone shed any light on these? The pump is single stage and, as mentioned, I have the head-flow curve. Cheers |
|
March 20, 2015, 03:18 |
|
#6 |
New Member
SUBODH KHULLAR
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi there
I am too simulating the flow in a centrifugal pump using MRF in fluent. But I am getting almost constant or rather increasing total head with increase in flow rate at constant RPM. However with increase in speed the total head increases i.e. I am getting a almost constant value at a particular speed irrespective of the flow rate. I have tried all the BC combinations, I can think off. I have tried - mass flow inlet and pressure outlet - mass flow inlet and outflow - pressure inlet ad pressure outlet But the results are coming the same. Can anyone shed some light on this problem. Thanks a lot in advance. |
|
April 22, 2021, 07:17 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Nelson HO
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain Imbalance | HMR | CFX | 5 | October 10, 2016 06:57 |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
natural convection | mehrdadeng | CFX | 10 | February 25, 2011 06:25 |
Update boundary conditions calculated by an external program | CedricVH | OpenFOAM | 2 | January 15, 2010 12:55 |
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) | Young | CFX | 5 | October 7, 2008 00:17 |