CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Boundary Conditions for Centrifugal Pump Analysis

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 26, 2012, 12:40
Default Boundary Conditions for Centrifugal Pump Analysis
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14
BigPapi34 is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

New to the CFD scene and looking for some guidance.

I've got the geometry of a centrifugal pump (not just an impeller) and am looking to generate a head-flow curve in Fluent and compare against the manufacturer's curve I have.

My problem arises when deciding what boundary conditions to use for the inlet and outlet.

Any ideas/suggestions would be great!

Cheers
BigPapi34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 15:34
Default
  #2
Member
 
David Stanbridge
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 16
swiftaircraft is on a distinguished road
Are you planning on a SRF or an MRF simulation? I would suggest you use a velocity inlet as then you know exactly how much flow you are feeding the pump and for the outlet use "OUtflow". If the outlet of the model is close to the outlet of the impeller a pressure outlet can adversely affect the flow characteristics you see. If you have reverse flow in the outflow then move the outlet of the model further from the outlet of the pump.
swiftaircraft is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 16:01
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14
BigPapi34 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for responding!

I'm using a MRF.

I've seen papers and other places suggesting using mass flow (inlet) and static pressure (outlet) or total pressure (inlet) and static pressure (outlet) but I'm having problems defining what these are.

If I choose to use the velocity inlet then what do you suggest I should be using as the gauge pressure in the inlet boundary screen?

Also, if I were to go for a pressure (outlet) BC, what would be the pressure utilised here?

Finally (apologies) - should this be conducted as a transient analysis?

Thanks in advance for any more info!
BigPapi34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2012, 16:52
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 97
Rep Power: 15
Sixkillers is on a distinguished road
MRF is more suitable for a steady state simulation. On the other hand sliding mesh technique is designed for a transient simulation. Needless to say that transient method is more time consuming. So you might want to start with steady state and see how it goes.
Sixkillers is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 27, 2012, 09:39
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 14
BigPapi34 is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the info.

I'm having a look at doing this a few different ways, currently using pressures for the inlet and outlet.

Most literature is states the following:

Inlet - 'total' pressure
Outlet - 'static' pressure

Can anyone shed any light on these?

The pump is single stage and, as mentioned, I have the head-flow curve.

Cheers
BigPapi34 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2015, 03:18
Default
  #6
New Member
 
SUBODH KHULLAR
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
sk692 is on a distinguished road
Hi there

I am too simulating the flow in a centrifugal pump using MRF in fluent. But I am getting almost constant or rather increasing total head with increase in flow rate at constant RPM. However with increase in speed the total head increases i.e. I am getting a almost constant value at a particular speed irrespective of the flow rate.
I have tried all the BC combinations, I can think off. I have tried
- mass flow inlet and pressure outlet
- mass flow inlet and outflow
- pressure inlet ad pressure outlet

But the results are coming the same.

Can anyone shed some light on this problem.

Thanks a lot in advance.
sk692 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 22, 2021, 07:17
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Nelson HO
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17
chingyinh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapi34 View Post
Thanks for the info.

I'm having a look at doing this a few different ways, currently using pressures for the inlet and outlet.

Most literature is states the following:

Inlet - 'total' pressure
Outlet - 'static' pressure

Can anyone shed any light on these?

The pump is single stage and, as mentioned, I have the head-flow curve.

Cheers
It seems most correct because the flow rate is subject to the system friction so velocity inlet / mass flow inlet should be wrong where the flow rate should not fix in the pump.
chingyinh is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Domain Imbalance HMR CFX 5 October 10, 2016 06:57
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions Anindya Main CFD Forum 25 February 27, 2016 13:58
natural convection mehrdadeng CFX 10 February 25, 2011 06:25
Update boundary conditions calculated by an external program CedricVH OpenFOAM 2 January 15, 2010 12:55
Concentric tube heat exchanger (Air-Water) Young CFX 5 October 7, 2008 00:17


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40.