|
[Sponsors] |
is Transient solution really needed for Propellers? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 20, 2011, 15:54 |
is Transient solution really needed for Propellers?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Emre G
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Turkey
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 15 |
I am solving thrust and torque on contra-rotating propellers ( there are two propellers rotating in counter sides)
Do I actually need a transient solution or Sliding mesh+steady state solver is enough? thanks. |
|
December 22, 2011, 17:56 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Vieri Abolaffio
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Always on the move.
Posts: 308
Rep Power: 17 |
Quote:
My two 0,02€ |
||
December 24, 2011, 02:25 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
you should go for the multiple reference frame approach first (steady state) and if not satisfied then go for the sliding mesh (transient). Keep in mind for sliding mesh to give you accurate results you may need big machines !!!!!!!
|
|
December 25, 2011, 17:20 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Emre G
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Turkey
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
how about the size of time step, do u have an idea about its proper scale? |
||
February 9, 2022, 23:10 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Nathan CHEN
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi Emre
Have you tried the transient sliding mesh on this contra-rotating propeller? May I ask how you dealt with the interface between the contra-rotating zones? For my case, if I set a pair of contra-rotating zones using mesh motion, the calculation would break immidateley and said "Node 1: Process 9092: Received signal SIGSEGV". Do you know the reason and how to solve this? Thank you very much. Nathan |
|
February 10, 2022, 00:10 |
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Emre G
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Turkey
Posts: 126
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
Yes i overcomed this issue ten years before Please check your interface surface mesh. İt should be unconformally mismatched or a very scewed mesh cell is encountered. And please start with MRF solution, if you still get same error check again interface surfaces if they have different diameters or have a big gap between them.. this would be a mesh issue ! |
||
February 10, 2022, 00:20 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Nathan CHEN
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Thanks Emre, and I will try it as you suggested.
I didn't notice that it has been more than ten years. It's really kind of you for replying me. Thank you again and wish you all the best. Nathan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transient solution not oscillating | paul83 | CFX | 20 | April 23, 2015 19:25 |
grid dependancy | gueynard a. | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2014 22:22 |
Transient conduction possible in fluent? | jlefevre76 | FLUENT | 2 | February 5, 2013 10:53 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 02:16 |
difference between false and true transient | mahesh prakash | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 21, 1999 14:45 |