|
[Sponsors] |
Bad Cd results applying k-ε models to hydrofoil |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 9, 2011, 06:17 |
Bad Cd results applying k-ε models to hydrofoil
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi guys,
I simulated a 2D hydrofoil geometry in non-cavitating conditions. The tested angles are from 0 to 10 degrees and the velocity is constant. I simulated this hydrofoil using Spalart-Allmaras, k-ε models and k-ω models. Using S-A and k-ω models i have good results for Cl and Cd comparing with experimental results. But using the k-ε models (standard,rng,realizable) i have good results for Cl but bad results for Cd (as the angle attack increases Cd decreases!) Also i used enhanced wall treatment (y+=1). k-ε models cant solve correctly the drag coefficient in hydrofoils? Please could you help me? spk |
|
December 10, 2011, 09:27 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 67
Rep Power: 17 |
The problem is solved!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bad results when compared with other simulations | Le Stanc | CFX | 12 | November 8, 2006 02:47 |
Bad results when compared with Wind Tunnel | Luiz | CFX | 7 | October 27, 2006 10:35 |
applying results as b.c on some other model | manohar | FLUENT | 3 | October 10, 2005 08:03 |
Comparing Results between Models | Mark | CFX | 2 | July 26, 2004 19:29 |
comparing different models and grids | Philipp | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 31, 2001 05:14 |