|
[Sponsors] |
gas-liquid 2 phase flow in microchannels using VoF |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 19, 2011, 05:53 |
gas-liquid 2 phase flow in microchannels using VoF
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi, everyone. I'm trying to use VoF model to simulate gas-liquid two-phase
flow in microchannels. firstly, I started with a 2-D simulation in a 500 micron wide T-shape microchannel. Details are listed below, # Segregated time dependent unsteady solver # PRESTO! for pressure interpolation # PISO for pressure-velocity coupling # Second-Order Up-Wind scheme for momentum equation # Geometry Reconstruction scheme for interface interpolation # Implicit body force for body force formulation # Courant Number 0.25 for volume fraction calculation # d = 0.5 mm, gas and liquid inlet length is 3*d, respectively. Main channel is 15*d in length. # U_L= U_G = 0.02 m/s # surface tension of water is 0.072 N/m # Contact angle 0 # Velocity inlets # Pressure outlet ( 0 gauge pressure ) # No-slip wall condition after that I tryed to reproduct one work of Qian et. al.( chem. eng. sci. 2006 ) by simulating a ─┴───── shaped microchannel in 2-D domain. the channel width, d, is aslo 0.5mm. And keep all the settings above unchanged, and these seetings are uniform as Qian reported in his paper. I can get the Taylor bubble flow pattern if the liquid goes in horizontally from the left inlet, and gas geos into the channel vertically. But if I exchange the two fluids, I got stratified flow pattern instead of Taylor flow. and refining grid is not working. However, increasing surface tension by a factor of 1.5 works. But according to Qian et. al.( chem. eng. sci. 2006 ), they got Taylor flow in such ─┴───── shaped channel. and I tried a Y-shaped channel with same configurations, and got stratified flow. But when I incresing the surface tension of water (0.072 N/m) by a factor of 1.2, Taylor flow can be obtained. So I wander why a lower serface tension can get a correct flow pattern. In many literature, they can get correct flow pattern with surface tension as low as approximately 0.02 N/m. How could they done that. Did I do something wrong? Last edited by LyngHoo; July 19, 2011 at 08:59. |
|
November 13, 2012, 20:01 |
reply to Lynghoo
|
#2 |
New Member
Justin
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Well, I also saw that paper and recently I am going to do the same thing.
Well do you have the exact same setting comparing with Qian's paper? Because I know that the surface tension is very important to control the slung flow, you can only have slung flow when the surface tension is large enough. Well, do you finish your simulaiton yet? I want to talk with you about this field.for example, Qian's paper said both the inlets are fixed by uniform velocity distribution, do you also did it in the same way? another problem is: do you use patch option in fluent? Best wishes for you! Justin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Convergence criteria of Solid liquid two phase flow. | trystwithgaurav | FLUENT | 0 | August 17, 2009 18:48 |
2 phase flow liquid flow solid particles | sachin | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | August 28, 2008 17:51 |
gas liquid flow | Yuqing Feng | CFX | 0 | May 4, 2004 22:26 |
Transient natural gas flow description | Leila | FLUENT | 0 | November 29, 2003 17:06 |
liquid and gas flow | faouzi | FLUENT | 3 | July 10, 2001 10:52 |