CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Multiphase Porous Media Flow - Convergence Issues

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 14, 2011, 16:47
Default Multiphase Porous Media Flow - Convergence Issues
  #1
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
VT_Bromley is on a distinguished road
System Description:

Two phase solid-gas flow. The sold being sand particles and the gas is air. Air is injected through a nozzle that entrains the sand particles up a ramp and the mixture hits a filter. The filter ideally filters out the sand particles which drop into a collection area while the air exits the system. A picture of this system can be seen below:



The nozzle is the square portion in the blue region on the left hand side. The end of the rectangle is the velocity inlet. The green line at the top right is where my porous media zone is (No the exact geometry used, but had a picture on hand). The pink is the sand initially and the blue is the air initially.


FLUENT Model Details:
  • Pressure-Based Solver
  • Transient
  • Eulerian-Eulerian Model
  • k-epsilon model
Porous Media Zone

Relative Velocity Resistance Formulation

Porosity: 0.8
  • Air
    • Viscous Resistance (Direction 1): 4.76E10
    • Viscous Resistance (Direction 2): 4.76E10
    • Inertial Resistance (Direction 1): 4.79E-6
    • Inertial Resistance (Direction 2): 4.79E-6
  • Sand
    • Viscous Resistance (Direction 1): 4.76E13
    • Viscous Resistance (Direction 2): 4.76E13
    • Inertial Resistance (Direction 1): 0.00479
    • Inertial Resistance (Direction 2): 0.00479
Boundary Conditions
  • Velocity Inlet ("Nozzle") - 345 m/s
  • Outlet (Top of Porous Media Zone) - 0 ga Pressure
Solution Methods
  • Scheme - Phase Coupled SIMPLE
  • Gradient - Least Squares Cell Based
  • Momentum - First Order Upwind
  • VF - First Order Upwind
  • Turbulent KE - First Order Upwind
  • Turbulent Dissipation Rate - First Order Upwind
  • Transient Formulation - First Order Implicit
Solution Controls


Under Relaxation Factors
  • Pressure - 0.3
  • Density - 1
  • Body Forces - 1
  • Momentum - 0.5
  • Granular Temperature - 0.2
  • Turbulent KE - 0.8
  • Turbulent Dissipation Rate - 0.8
  • Turbulent Viscosity - 1
Problem

I have solved this case without the porous media zone and just using a pressure outlet. My issue was that particulate was flowing out of the outlet and not being collected as desired. The case runs fine until the Volume Fraction becomes anything but 1 (all air) at the porous media zone. An example of the residuals up until this point is shown below:



The volume fraction of air at this point is shown below. The rectangle section at the top right is my porous media zone:



Then I get to this point:



And the residuals begin to flat line or really struggle to converge.


What has been tried to remedy the problem:
  • variable time steps
  • messing with the Courant number
  • second order discretizations
  • adjusting the porous media parameters
  • under-relaxation factors
All to no avail.

I did get it converging for a little while but then this happened:



And it diverged very soon after.


Any ideas on what I can try? Do all of my settings look correct?

Thanks!
Mike
VT_Bromley is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 17, 2011, 16:09
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
VT_Bromley is on a distinguished road
I have still been working at this to no avail. I doubt my values for the viscous and inertial resistance though. I used a orifice style flow bench to find the pressure drop versus velocity curve. I then fit the curve with a quadratic function and used the coefficients to solve for alpha and C2. However, I'm unfamiliar with "typical" values and am not sure that it is right. Here is my data and the plot. The filter is just a coffee filter so I wouldn't expect it to be too restrictive.

VT_Bromley is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2011, 02:01
Default
  #3
Member
 
Byron Smith R J
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17
byronsmith is on a distinguished road
hai
wats the boundary condition imposed on the filter material. u need to create a bc such that only air passes through and sand is retained
byronsmith is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 18, 2011, 11:56
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
VT_Bromley is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by byronsmith View Post
hai
wats the boundary condition imposed on the filter material. u need to create a bc such that only air passes through and sand is retained
As far as I know there is no option for such a boundary condition; hence the use of the porous media. If I'm incorrect please let me know.
VT_Bromley is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2011, 00:23
Default
  #5
Member
 
Byron Smith R J
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: India
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 17
byronsmith is on a distinguished road
to selectively transport one component u will have to write UDF
byronsmith is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 23, 2011, 11:38
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Michael
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 16
VT_Bromley is on a distinguished road
That is one method, but a porous media zone should work as well as you can apply different resistances to each phase. Therefore I apply a large viscous and intertial resistance to the solid phase to prevent it from passing through the porous zone.

I did manage to get the problem to converge and prevent the solid phase from flowing through the porous zone. I removed the visous resistance for air as this should not really be a factor.

It is working great, but I have it currently set as a variable time step and to converge it is stepping at 1e-8 seconds. As you can imagine with about 200 iterations per time step this solution is taking a LONG time.

Does anyone have any hints/tips to speed up convergence in this case?

Thanks,
Mike
VT_Bromley is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 5, 2020, 13:53
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Okwoche James
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Lagos, Nigeria
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
JAMESOK is on a distinguished road
Please, how did you arrived at the value of the viscous and inertia resistance?

I really need to find values for the inertia and viscous resistance of fired pottery clay and sand as well.

anyone who can help, please?

Thanks in advance

James
JAMESOK is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 14, 2020, 17:34
Default
  #8
New Member
 
roshan
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
roshanak.rabiee878 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by VT_Bromley View Post
I have still been working at this to no avail. I doubt my values for the viscous and inertial resistance though. I used a orifice style flow bench to find the pressure drop versus velocity curve. I then fit the curve with a quadratic function and used the coefficients to solve for alpha and C2. However, I'm unfamiliar with "typical" values and am not sure that it is right. Here is my data and the plot. The filter is just a coffee filter so I wouldn't expect it to be too restrictive.

Hi
if you want to use the pressure-velocity curve for estimation of alpha(m-2),C2(m-0 (two coefficients for porous media) you have to divide pressure by depth of packing the use slope to evaluate alpha and c2.
dP/H=alpha*mu*U+(0.5rho*C2*U*U)
roshanak.rabiee878 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2024, 03:59
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Liam Jose
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
hailejose is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by VT_Bromley View Post
That is one method, but a porous media zone should work as well as you can apply different resistances to each phase. Therefore I apply a large viscous and intertial resistance to the solid phase to prevent it from passing through the porous zone.

I did manage to get the problem to converge and prevent the solid phase from flowing through the porous zone. I removed the visous resistance for air as this should not really be a factor.

It is working great, but I have it currently set as a variable time step and to converge it is stepping at 1e-8 seconds. As you can imagine with about 200 iterations per time step this solution is taking a LONG time.

Does anyone have any hints/tips to speed up convergence in this case?

Thanks,
Mike
did you find any way to speed up the time and reach appreciable convergence with the porous media approach?
hailejose is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porous media setup issues in Fluent Bernard Van FLUENT 29 January 26, 2017 05:09
multiphase flow in porous media zhou FLUENT 2 August 9, 2012 08:10
Can LES be used in porous media flow? Jin Main CFD Forum 0 October 19, 2006 09:50
Simulation of Porous Media Flow Sharad Dugad FLUENT 0 December 24, 2001 02:57
Help :Porous media flow Wole CFX 7 August 30, 2001 21:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54.