|
[Sponsors] |
February 4, 2011, 05:16 |
convergence criteria
|
#1 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
hi all users,
i am running an unsteady case of Cascade T106A. It is a bounded flow. i want to ask what convergence criteria i have to used? Mass flow rate will be ok or not? any guide line for me please? Regards: Aqib |
|
February 4, 2011, 05:36 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I would uncheck convergence criteria
Just let iterate and monitor any quantity yu are interested (for instance massfow)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 4, 2011, 08:24 |
|
#3 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks for replying....
i am interested in the co-efficient of loss pressure in which i have to compared my case with some other case..... should i iterate both cases to the same number of iterations? secondly, in "the co-efficient of loss pressure" formula there is a quantity of "inlet stagnation pressure" which varied after every 500 iterations.... so what does it means? which value i have to be used? |
|
February 4, 2011, 08:41 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
what is co-efficient of loss pressure?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 4, 2011, 09:13 |
|
#5 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
The total pressure loss coefficient
ω=(Pt(inlet)-Pt(outlet))/q(inlet) inlet where ω is the total pressure loss coefficient, Pt is the stagnation pressure, and q(inlet) is the dynamic pressure at the inlet |
|
February 4, 2011, 09:14 |
|
#6 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
in my case dynamic pressure at inlet(q) remains same but both the stagnation pressure at inlet and outlet varied with number of iterations
|
|
February 4, 2011, 09:44 |
|
#7 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Then you didn't reach convergence.
Let iterate untill you get constant values
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 7, 2011, 02:32 |
|
#8 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks for replying....
my solution is converged but it is periodically converged....that's why the values are varying with the iterations..... |
|
February 7, 2011, 03:08 |
|
#9 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Sorry I just checked, that you are working with unsteady solver.
Is your monitoring x-axis iterations or time step? (post a picture) I cannot remember if you can choose between iterations and time step in the monitoring panel (for unsteady solver).
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 7, 2011, 08:37 |
|
#10 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
attaching the picture of inlet and outlet stagnation pressure
|
|
February 8, 2011, 02:05 |
|
#11 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I don't think this is an absolute convergence monitoring, but unsteady monitoring.
If I am right you can see, the "convergence" (especially in the left chart), it looks like stairs. Each stair represents a convergence loop. To be sure, just increase the max iterations per time step, and replot: the stairs should be stretched.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 8, 2011, 05:25 |
|
#12 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
so its mean my solution is converged?
|
|
February 8, 2011, 05:49 |
|
#13 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
if the "stairs" are stretched while you increased the max iteration/time step, then your solution converged for each time step
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
February 8, 2011, 06:30 |
|
#14 |
Member
Muhammad Aqib Chishty
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks yes it is visualize to me....
solution is converged.... |
|
March 7, 2012, 05:41 |
Divergence detected in AMG solver: temperature
|
#15 |
Member
Arun
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vellore,TN,India
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 14 |
Hi,
I doing the cascade and i'm new to CFD. I like to know what are the input values i need to have with me before i start fluent. I just finished the gambit and now waiting for solution. My case is 2D. I using K-omega SST. I'm pleased if some one help me about the steps i need to follow to solve. (I had the same problem "Divergence detected in AMG solver: omega" i changed URF to F-cycle.) |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What value shall I set for the Convergence criteria? | steventay | CFX | 7 | May 14, 2010 13:44 |
Convergence criteria | PrandtlGlawert | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 13, 2009 18:13 |
Convergence Criteria | edwin | FLUENT | 1 | February 14, 2008 20:24 |
Global Convergence Criteria | asaha | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 9, 2007 10:53 |
CAVITATION (convergence criteria & discretization) | ROOZBEH | FLUENT | 1 | October 6, 2003 10:32 |