|
[Sponsors] |
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 24, 2011, 11:48 |
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number
|
#1 |
New Member
Waseem
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I am modeling heat transfer in a two-pass trapezoidal channe using Fluent. The Reynolds number at the inlet is 9400. I used low-Re k-epsilon model, RNG k-epsilon model, realisable k-epsilon model, standard k-omega model and SST k-omega model of Fluent to model turbulence. The comparison of numerical results with experiemnts shows that low-Re k-epsilon model is most accurate. The litrature on the other hand shows that SST k-omega model is the best. What can be the reason that I am not coming to the same conclusion as researchs have shown in the literature. Is there any limitation with respect to the Reynolds number in the choice of a particular turbulence model? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Limitation in Discrete Particle Model | Woo Meng Wai | FLUENT | 0 | September 12, 2007 07:22 |
Limitation of 2D and 3D model element number | Soon | CFX | 3 | January 30, 2006 16:15 |
Any mesh limitation for SSG Reynolds Stress Model? | Sam | Main CFD Forum | 1 | October 13, 2005 13:34 |
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model | Jonas Larsson | FLUENT | 5 | March 13, 2000 04:27 |